IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
G.NARAYANASAMY – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
Writ Petition No.34594 of 2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. circumstances of marriage, child's existence, and application for legal heirship. (Para 2) |
| 2. court’s view on the unsustainability of rejection based on objections. (Para 4) |
| 3. directions for processing the application independent of property disputes. (Para 5) |
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Dinesh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Neelakandan Additional Advocate General Asst. by: Mr.S.Jayachandran Government Advocate for R1 & R2 ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the on-line rejection order of the
2nd respondent and for a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to act upon the application submitted by the petitioner and to issue legal heiship certificate to the petitioner.
2.The case of the petitioner is that he was married to one Sarasa. Through the wedlock, they had a girl child named Sanjana. The petitioner's wife died intestate on 21.01.2021, leaving behind the petitioner and his daughter. The petitioner applied for legal heirship certificate. The same was objected by the petitioner's mother-in-law. That apart, the petitioner's mother-in-law also filed a suit in OS.No.6463 of 2022, before the First Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai and the same was pending. Under such circumstances, the application submitted by the petitioner came to be rejected through the on-line rejection order. The same has been put to challenge in the present writ petition.
3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
4.In the considered view of this Court, the 2nd respondent does not deal with the inter se rights of the parties and what is given as a legal heirship certificate is only in the nature of a relationship certificate. On going through the materials placed before this Court, it is seen that the deceased Sarasa is the wife of the petitioner and through the wedlock, they had a daughter named Sanjana. Therefore, just because, mother-in-law objected to the legal heirship certificate being issued, the 2nd respondent cannot reject the application stating that there is an objection and there is a Civil Suit pending and therefore no legal heirship certificate will be given. Such a stand taken by the 2nd respondent is unsustainable.
5.In the light of the above discussion, there shall be a direction to the petitioner to submit a fresh application before the 2nd respondent by including the names of all the legal heirs. On receipt of the same, the 2nd respondent shall process the application and issue legal heirship certificate within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. It is made clear that the issuance of legal heirship certificate has nothing to do with the dispute over the property between the petitioner and his mother-in-law. The same shall be considered on its own merits and in N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
KP accordance with law by the concerned Civil Court without being influenced by this order or the legal heirship certificate issued by the Tahsildar pursuant to this order.
6.This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.