Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Murali Shankar, J
P.Paramasivan – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Police Station, Thoothukudi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial review over police final reports. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. obligations to continue investigations. (Para 4 , 8 , 12) |
| 3. legal significance of complaints involving religious sentiments. (Para 5 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court orders for further investigation. (Para 15) |
ORDER
2. The petitioner/defacto complainant has lodged a complaint originally with East Police Station, Kovilpatti and subsequently, due to the instructions of the said police, before the respondent police alleging that one Sathish Kumar posted a photo along with comments about Lord Krishna on 19.08.2022 through his Face Book Id: URL-https://WWW.Facebook.Com/Sathishkumar 37 (Profile Name Sathish Kumar) wherein the said photo shows that some of the girls nudely taking bath at pool and Lord Krishna seeing it fromt the top of the tree
The petitioner has also alleged that he was deeply hurt by the misrepresented photo, which caused him significant mental anguish. It is further alleged that the said Sathish Kumar posted the photo and comments with intention of defaming Hindu Gods and damaging the image of Hindu women and potentially creating a law and order problem and promoting enmity between different groups on religion
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
