SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 14393

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
R.Chandrasekar – Appellant
Versus
A.Arunagiri – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.12.2019 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN C.R.P. PD 2256 of 2015 and M.P. 1 of 2015

1. R.Chandrasekar 2. C.Venkatapathy

3. C.Ravi ... Petitioners Vs.

1. A.Arunagiri

2. R.Sivakozhundu ... Respondents Prayer :- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Art.227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the petition and order dated 19.11.2014 passed in I.A. 884 of 2014 in O.S. 312 of 2014 on the file of the learned Addl. District Munsif Court, Cuddalore.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Gururaj For Respondents : Mrs.R.Meenal

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order allowing the 1st respondent/plaintiff application appointing the Advocate Commissioner.

2. The petitioners are the defendants 1 to 3 in the Suit.

The 1st respondent/plaintiff has filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the petitioners from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. Pending suit, the plaintiff has filed an application to appoint Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical features, and the Trial Court had allowed the application without conducting any enquiry. Challengi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top