SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 63231

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, A.D.MARIA CLETE, JJ
Gabriel Anburaj @ Gabriel – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector of Kanyakumari at Nagercoil Kanyakumari District – Respondent
W.P.(MD) No.4680 of 2025 | W.M.P.(MD) Nos.3368 & 3371 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr.K.N.Thampi
For the Respondents: Mr.S.P.Maharajan, Mr.S.S.Madhavan, Mr.S.Suresh Manickam

A writ petition challenging removal of encroachments on government land was dismissed, emphasizing authority's right to enforce removal under the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 - Section 128 - Writ petition challenging notices issued by local authorities regarding encroachments on government land - Petitioners alleged possession of land but failed to establish rights - Court upheld authority's actions to remove encroachments. (Paras 2-7)

(B) Encroachment - Legal basis - The need for removal of encroachments from government land affirmed, stressing the public purpose of maintaining government property. (Paras 6-7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners contested notices for removal of encroachments on government land, claiming possession but lacking documents to establish entitlement.

Findings of Court:
The writ petition was dismissed as the petitioners could not substantiate their claims against consistent governmental actions requiring removal of illegal occupation.

Issues: Whether adequate rights were established by the petitioners against government land claim and legality of issued notices.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found no undue actions by the Executive Officer stressing the need to safeguard government properties for public welfare and reiterating the authority's mandated power to address encroachments.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to notices regarding encroachments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. claim of possession by petitioners. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's observation on governmental authority. (Para 6 , 7)

[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]

The notices issued by the Executive Officer of Karungal Selection Grade Town Panchayat, are under challenge in this writ petition.

2. The authorities concerned have identified the encroachments in the vested properties, which belong to the Government and falling within the territorial jurisdiction of Karungal Selection Grade Town Panchayat. Since the said Government land is falling within the territorial jurisdiction of the Selection Grade Town Panchayat, notice under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act , 1998, was issued to the petitioners affording an opportunity to them to submit their explanation.

3. Enforcement actions had been initiated long back and the encroachers are in occupation of the Government land by filing multiple litigations / petitions. Notices were issued repeatedly on 21.08.2024, 31.08.2024, 24.09.2024, 25.10.2024 and a final notice on 04.12.2024, which are impugned in the present writ petition. The petitioners submitted explanation during January, 2025 seeking time to collect documents. Even thereafter, they have not produced any document to the authorities concerned to establish their rights. Since the subject land is a Government land, the authorities concerned have afforded an opportunity to the petitioners enabling them to submit the documents, if any, available with them.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are possessing B-Memo.

5. Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit the said B-Memo was cancelled subsequently, since it was erroneously granted.

6. As on date, the petitioners are encroachers of a Government land, which is falling within the territorial jurisdiction of Karungal Selection Grade Town Panchayat. Thus, the Executive Officer of Karungal Selection Grade Town Panchayat is vested with the powers under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act , 1998, and issued notice for removal of encroachments. In the counter affidavit, the Executive Officer has relied on the consistent decision of this Court reported in AIR MAD 311 for the purpose of protecting the ponds, water bodies etc., for posterity. The Full Bench of this Court in T.K.Shanmugam vs. State , reported in 2015 (2) CWC 849, held that even the tanks, which do not fall within the purview of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks Act , 2007, also require protection from encroachment by invoking the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act , 1905.

7. In the present case, the subject land falls within the jurisdiction of a Selection Grade Town Panchayat and therefore, action was initiated under Section 128 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act , 1998. This Court do not find any infirmity in the action initiated by the Executive Officer. Repeated notices had already been issued to the petitioners and sufficient opportunities were afforded to them. That being the position, the authorities concerned are directed to proceed with the enforcement action to remove the encroachments and to protect the Government lands for the public purpose or to implement the Government welfare schemes.

8. With the above observations, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top