SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 79504

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
A.Gopinath – Appellant
Versus
Sakthibala – Respondent
C.R.P.[NPD](MD)No.1911 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.P.Krishnasamy for Mr.S.Maya Perumal
For the Respondents: Mr.A.Mohan

The court upheld the enforceability of maintenance orders and affirmed the responsibility of the petitioner to remain compliant with payment obligations.

Headnote:This judgment analyzes and addresses the order in Cr.M.P.No.3671 of 2018 in D.V.C.No.6 of 2016. The petitioner challenged an earlier maintenance order, having accrued arrears. The court found the appeals for waiver invalid, emphasizing accountability for maintenance obligations. The core issue was whether the petitioner could challenge the trial court's warrant issuance for non-payment of arrears. The court ruled that the petitioner must comply with prior orders regarding maintenance payments, reinforcing legal responsibilities. The court disposed of the petition, mandating monthly payments of Rs.50,000 in addition to Rs.10,000 maintenance by the 7th of every month.

Table of Content
1. challenging warrant for maintenance non-payment. (Para 2)
2. petitioner agrees to new maintenance payment plan. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court affirms payment directive for maintenance. (Para 6)

O R D E R

This petition has been filed seeking to set aside the order passed in Cr.M.P.No.3671 of 2018 in D.V.C.No.6 of 2016, dated 14.05.2025, on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar.

2.Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner /

husband filed a divorce petition and the respondent / wife filed domestic violence petition in D.V.C.No.6 of 2016. The trial Court by its order dated 19.02.2018 ordered for Rs.10,000/- rupees as monthly maintenance. However, in respect of other claims, the same was rejected. Aggrieved by the same, the present petitioner preferred appeal before the Lower Appellate Court on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar in Crl.A.(MD)No. 27 of 2022. The lower appellate Court confirmed the order, as against which, no further appeal was preferred. However, for non-payment of the arrears amount, the trial Court issued warrant against the petitioner. Challenging the same, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.

3.Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the total arrears amount is Rs.6,73,000/- and the petitioner is ready to pay Rs.50,000/- per month without any default. Accordingly, he prays for appropriate orders.

4.Learned Counsel for the respondent has no serious objection for the same. He would submit that apart from this Rs.50,000/-, this Court may issue a direction to the petitioner to pay the monthly maintenance of RS.10,000/-, without any default.

5.The facts in the present case are not in dispute. Admittedly, for non-

payment of the arrears of maintenance amount, warrant has been issued against the petitioner, which came to be challenged by way of the present Civil Revision Petition. Subsequently, the warrant came to be executed and the petitioner was put behind the bars. Thereafter, this Court by its earlier order dated 11.07.2025, granted an interim order by directing the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.1.5 lakhs and on such deposit, the trial Court was directed to release the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner deposited the said amount and was released. Hence, nothing survives for further consideration in the present Civil Revision Petition. However, now the petitioner himself has agreed to pay the arrears of maintenance amount in instalments.

6.In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- every month towards arrears of maintenance amount in addition to the monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month. The said amount shall be paid on or before 7th of every month. However, on failure to deposit the arrears of maintenance amount, the respondent / wife is at liberty to proceed in accordance with law, for realization of the maintenance amount. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top