Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
Sulochana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's purchase and alleged interference by defendants. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's evaluation of evidence and findings on property rights. (Para 7 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties regarding possession and title. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. final decision on the appeal. (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT
The defendants are before this Court on appeal.
2. The Second Appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree, dated 09.07.2018 in A.S.No.102 of 2017, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Aranthangi, reversing the judgment and decree dated 16.02.2016 in O.S.No.20 of 2006, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Aranthangi.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court.
4. The case of the plaintiff is that she has purchased the items 1 to 6 of the suit properties through a registered sale deed dated 21.02.2005 in Ex.A.1 from one Ramasamy, Amirthalingam and Velu for a valuable consideration. Since there was an error that crept in the sale deed in Ex.A.1, the same was rectified through a rectification deed dated 03.03.2005 in Ex.A.2. Pursuant to the purchase, the plaintiff was put in possession of the suit pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
