SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
Sulochana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants: Mr.N.Balakrishnan
For the Respondent: Mr.M.Rameshkumar

JUDGMENT

The defendants are before this Court on appeal.

2. The Second Appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree, dated 09.07.2018 in A.S.No.102 of 2017, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Aranthangi, reversing the judgment and decree dated 16.02.2016 in O.S.No.20 of 2006, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Aranthangi.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the trial Court.

4. The case of the plaintiff is that she has purchased the items 1 to 6 of the suit properties through a registered sale deed dated 21.02.2005 in Ex.A.1 from one Ramasamy, Amirthalingam and Velu for a valuable consideration. Since there was an error that crept in the sale deed in Ex.A.1, the same was rectified through a rectification deed dated 03.03.2005 in Ex.A.2. Pursuant to the purchase, the plaintiff was put in possession of the suit properties and the revenue documents were mutated in her favour and Patta No.528 was also issued. The plaintiff's vendors were paying the taxes for the suit properties prior to the purchase and patta stood in their names for fasli 1395, 1396, 1411, 1412, 1413 and 1414. Pursuant to her purchase, the same has been t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top