SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 63861

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. BALAJI
M/s. RAMANIYAM REAL ESTATES PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
ARUN MALHOTRA – Respondent


ORDER

The above Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the ex-parte order dated 17.06.2025 in CRP.No.1418 of 2024 and to rehear the matter on merits, by giving an opportunity to the petitioner.

2.I have heard Mr. ARL.Sundaresan, learned Senior Counsel for Mrs.S.Vaitheeswari, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.N.Vijay Narayan, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.Prahalad K.Bhat, learned Counsel for respondents 1 to 4 and Mr.N.Muthuvel, learned Government Advocate for respondents 5 and 6.

3.The learned Senior Counsel, Mr. ARL.Sundaresan, would state that the petitioner was not served in the revision through Court. He would invite my attention to the notice sent by Speed Post with acknowledgment card due and delivery report issued by the Postal Department and contend that the revision petitioner has not produced the acknowledgment card for having sent notice in the CRP, through Speed Post. He would therefore state that without filing the acknowledgment card, mere reliance on the tracking sheet and delivery report issued by the Postal Department is of no avail. Referring to the Court status in the e-Courts site, the learned Senior Counsel would state that, admit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top