IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. BALAJI
R.SUNDARARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
U.PARTHAN – Respondent
ORDER
The plaintiffs in O.S.No.2422 of 2021 on the file of the XVI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, aggrieved by the order in I.A.No.3 of 2023, directing impleadment of the 1st respondent herein as a defendant in the suit, are come up this Court by way of this revision.
2.I have heard Mr.VRaghavachari, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.Avinash Wadhwani, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Sesubalan Raja, learned counsel for M/s.ASN.Atthik Legal Solutions, counsel for the 1st respondent.
3.Mr.V.Raghavachari, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners would contend that in a suit is for declaration and recovery of possession against the 2nd respondent herein, the 1st respondent herein sought to implead himself and the Trial Court has erroneously entertained the said application, without application of mind to the specific facts and circumstances of the case. He would further state that even according to the 1st respondent, he is not a registered owner of the suit property and he approached the Court only on the premise that he holds a valid Power of Attorney and that he was put in possession of the suit property and has the original documents and title in his custody.
4.The learn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.