SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 63862

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr.Justice P.B. BALAJI
R.SUNDARARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
U.PARTHAN – Respondent


ORDER

The plaintiffs in O.S.No.2422 of 2021 on the file of the XVI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, aggrieved by the order in I.A.No.3 of 2023, directing impleadment of the 1st respondent herein as a defendant in the suit, are come up this Court by way of this revision.

2.I have heard Mr.VRaghavachari, learned Senior Counsel for Mr.Avinash Wadhwani, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Sesubalan Raja, learned counsel for M/s.ASN.Atthik Legal Solutions, counsel for the 1st respondent.

3.Mr.V.Raghavachari, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners would contend that in a suit is for declaration and recovery of possession against the 2nd respondent herein, the 1st respondent herein sought to implead himself and the Trial Court has erroneously entertained the said application, without application of mind to the specific facts and circumstances of the case. He would further state that even according to the 1st respondent, he is not a registered owner of the suit property and he approached the Court only on the premise that he holds a valid Power of Attorney and that he was put in possession of the suit property and has the original documents and title in his custody.

4.The learn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top