Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SHAMIM AHMED, J
P.Shanmugam – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Collectorate, Pudukottai District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner alleges denial of a personal hearing regarding illegal mining. (Para 3) |
| 2. respondents argue that action is being taken to investigate the allegations. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court emphasizes the importance of providing a fair hearing before committee decisions. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
Heard Mr.M.Saravanakumar, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr.M.Lingadurai, learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondents.
2. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st Respondent in his proceedings no.Na.Ka.No.245/2025(PuMaSu), dated 08.08.2025, and quash the same.
3. Mr.M.Saravanakumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner was not given an opportunity of personal hearing as directed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.03.2025 passed in W.P.(MD) No.5554 of 2025. He submits that an inquiry summon was issued on 02.07.2025 by the Assistant Director, Geology and Mining Department, Pudukottai, directing the petitioner to appear on 11.07.2025 along with one Muthumani
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
