Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
S.Thanigaivel – Appellant
Versus
N.Porkodi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claimant's premises for appeal concerning prior compensation amounts. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on the adequacy of compensation and adjustments. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's directive to revise compensation to reflect actual losses. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. final ruling affirming the adjusted compensation amount. (Para 8) |
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
This matter was taken up for hearing under the caption “For Being Mentioned” today at the instance of the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. The learned counsel for appellant would submit that this Court by Judgment dated 10.07.2025 partly allowed the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. However, he would submit that this court enhanced compensation towards loss of income from Rs.12,000/- for one month to Rs.15,000/- for six months, but it was not added in the calculation column. Hence, he prayed to modify the calculation column and requested to issue fresh order copy. Accordingly, the matter has been listed today.
3. Heard the contentions of learned counsel for appellant and perused the order.
4.Considering his submissions, Registry is directed to substitute calculation column in para 6 and para 7 of judgment as follows:-
S.No
Compensation awar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
