Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, G.ARUL MURUGAN, JJ
B.Manikandan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing of counsel for both parties. (Para 1) |
| 2. petition details and illegal encroachments outlined. (Para 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 3. directing authorities for action on encroachments. (Para 6) |
| 4. emphasis on following legal procedures for removing encroachments. (Para 7) |
(Order of the Court was made by G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.)
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.S.P.Maharajan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 5, Mr.T.Senthilkumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the sixth respondent and Mr.P.Venkatasubramanian, learned counsel appearing for the eighth respondent.
2.The Writ Petition is filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 6 to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 7 and 8 in the subject property.
3.Pursuant to the filing of the Writ Petition, an inspection was conducted and based on the inspection report, a status report has been filed by the Tahsildar/the third respondent.
4.In the inspection conducted, it was found that the respondents
7 and 8 had illegally encroached upon the National Highways Road from Dindigul to Madurai Road and the stream (Odai) in S.F.No.155, Paravai 2nd Bit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
