IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.Jayachandran, J
K.S.Vinoda Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Yasodha Wife of Ramakrishanan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim to ownership based on remittance. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. evidence must correlate to property ownership timing. (Para 9 , 10) |
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.69 of 2023 K.S.Vinoda Kumar, Son of Subramani No.6, Shriram Street, Dhinesh Nagar, Ayanambakkam, Chenai 600 095. .. Appellant/Plaintiff /versus/
1.Yasodha Wife of Ramakrishanan 4/234, Nakkeerar Street, Mygappair East, Chennai 37.
2.K.Nirmala Wife of Vinoda Kumar
4/234, Nakkeerar Street, Mugappair East, Chennai 37. .. Respondents/Defendants Appeal Suit has been filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the fair and decreetal order passed in O.S.No.177 of 2018, dated 14.10.2019 on the file of the III Additional District Court, Thiruvallur at Poonamallee.
For Appellant :Mr.S.C.Viswanth For Respondents :Mr.K.Premkumar for R1 and R2 JUDGMENT This appeal suit is directed against the dismissal of O.S.No.177 of
2018 preferred by the appellant herein.
2. The appellant is the husband of the second respondent. The first respondent is the mother of the second respondent.
3. The case of the appellant as found in the plaint is that the suit schedule property was purchased from out of the money sent by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.