Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 64843
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
Thilakarasu Venkatasamy trading as Grand Catering Company – Appellant
Versus
Brand Avatar LLP – Respondent
OP(TM)No.64 of 2024 | OP(TM)No.65 of 2024
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Sathish Kumar, Mr.G.Ramji
For the Respondents: Mr.M.S.Bharath, Mr.V.S.Krishna, Ms.Reshma Rajagopal, Mr.J.Madhanagopal Rao, SPC
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Sathish Kumar, Mr.G.Ramji
For the Respondents: Mr.M.S.Bharath, Mr.V.S.Krishna, Ms.Reshma Rajagopal, Mr.J.Madhanagopal Rao, SPC
Settlement agreements can result in court proceedings being dismissed without costs when parties reach an accord.
Headnote:This judgment concerns the Original Petitions under Sections 57 & 125 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, where the petitioner sought to rectify registrations in Class 41. The petition was addressed following a settlement agreement filed by the parties. The court determined to dismiss the petitions as settled out of court without costs.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties reached a settlement. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitions dismissed as settled. (Para 2) |
COMMON ORDER
Parties have arrived at a settlement and filed joint memo dated
14.08.2025 enclosing settlement agreement of August 2025. In view of such settlement, the parties request that these proceedings be dismissed as settled out of Court.
2. Accordingly, OP(TM)Nos.64 & 65 of 2024 are dismissed as settled out of Court without any order as to costs.
