IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
K.Palanisamy – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Office of the Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai – Respondent
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to modify the date of regularization of the petitioner's service on completion of one year of his initial service from date of his appointment i.e., 14.09.2001 in the 2nd respondent Corporation, in terms of G.O.Ms.No.125, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department dated 27.05.1999 and grant pension to the petitioner under old pension scheme with all the attendant benefits within the time stipulated by this Court.
2. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the aforesaid relief has been sought for by the petitioner, now, he confines the prayer that it would suffice if the representation submitted by the petitioner dated
07.03.2025 is disposed of in accordance with law.
4. It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon him to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.