The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary Public Works Department Fort St. George, Madras – 09. vs Tamil Nadu PWD and Highways Employees Union Rep. N.378CPT/77, Rep. by its General Secretary C. Ramakrishnan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65293

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. Suresh Kumar, P. Dhanabal, JJ
The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary Public Works Department Fort St. George, Madras – 09. – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu PWD and Highways Employees Union Rep. N.378CPT/77, Rep. by its General Secretary C. Ramakrishnan – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.J.Ravindran, Mr.S.Yashwanth
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Nambi Arooran

Table of Content
1. the need for condonation of delay in filing appeals. (Para 1 , 2 , 5)
2. justification for the delay related to administrative processes. (Para 3 , 4 , 8)
3. court's observations on employment regularization and impact of time. (Para 7 , 9 , 11)
4. court's finding on special measures for remaining eligible candidates. (Para 12)
5. final orders of the court regarding delay condonation and resolutions. (Para 14)

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL M.P.Nos.1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 & 1 of 2013 in W.A.Sr.Nos.64898, 64902, 64907, 64912, 64917, 64922, 64927, 64932, 64937, 64942, 64950, 64952, 64959, 64965 & 64967 of 2013 [M.P.No.1 of 2013 in W.A.Sr.No.64898 of 2013]

1. The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary Public Works Department Fort St. George, Madras – 09.

2. The Chief Engineer Highways and Rural Works Chepauk, Madras – 5.

3. The Assistant Engineer Highways Department, Kodumudi Periyar District. .. Petitioners Vs.

Tamil Nadu PWD and Highways Employees Union Rep. N.378CPT/77, Rep. by its General Secretary C. Ramakrishnan, No.4/130-D Ma.Po.Si. Nagar, 2^nd Street, Thiruvallur. .. Respondent Prayer: Petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document