ORDER

By consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

2. This writ petition has been filed challenging impugned selection list published by the 4^th respondent in Notification No. 01/2024, dated 07.07.2025, and to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to conduct the selection process for the post of Salesmen notified by the 3^rd respondent vide Advertisement No. 01/2024, dated 09.10.2024 afresh by following the procedures under law.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner participated in the selection process for the post of Salesman in the respondent Society. As per the notification dated 09.10.2024, the estimated vacancy is only 40, however, contrary to the estimated vacancy, 52 candidates were selected and apart from that communal roster system was not followed. On these grounds, the learned counsel prays for interference.

4. However, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents would contend that the writ petition is not at all maintainable for more than one reason. He would submit that the petitioner has participated in the selection process as PSTM candidates und