Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.Arul Murugan, J
Sathiyanarayanan – Appellant
Versus
Balasubramanian – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff claims specific performance of an oral agreement. (Para 6 , 10 , 16) |
| 2. defendant argues limitations and contract validity. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 25) |
| 3. court discusses evidence supporting the agreement. (Para 17 , 18 , 20 , 27 , 28) |
| 4. court affirms validity of oral agreements and claims. (Para 24 , 29) |
| 5. the appeals are dismissed, no costs ordered. (Para 31) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
The first defendant is before this Court on appeal.
2. S.A.(MD)No.147 of 2019 is filed challenging the judgment and decree, dated 27.09.2018 in A.S.No.15 of 2017, on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track Court), Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District, reversing the judgment and decree dated 14.09.2016 in O.S.No.46 of 2014, on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
3. S.A.(MD)No.148 of 2019 is filed challenging the judgment and decree, dated 27.09.2018 in A.S.No.51 of 2017, on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track Court), Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District, reversing the judgment and decree dated 14.09.2016 in O.S.No.46 of 2014, on the file of the Additional Subordinate Court, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
4. Since both the appeals
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
