IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.SUNDAR, T. VINOD KUMAR, JJ
T.Murugan – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector VOC Nagar, Chengalpet – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim regarding illegal encroachments. (Para 1) |
| 2. concerns regarding governmental inaction. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. procedure for addressing encroachments stipulated. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. affirmation of rights of encroachers and due process. (Para 6) |
| 5. court mandates survey and action specifications. (Para 7) |
(made by M.SUNDAR, J.)
Subject matter of captioned main ‘writ petition’ [‘WP’ for the sake of brevity] is alleged encroachments in ‘Survey No.4/1, No.82, Pekkaranai Village, Lathoor Sub-Taluk, Cheyyur Taluk, Chengalpet District’ [hereinafter ‘said land’ for the sake of convenience and clarity].
2. Request for removal of aforereferred alleged encroachments has not yielded results and that has necessitated captioned WP is the submission of learned counsel for writ petitioner.
3. Ms.J.Deepika, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner and Mr.T.K.Saravanan, learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 5 are before us.
4. Learned State counsel for respondents 1 to 5 submits that survey of said land will be done after putting all concerned on notice and in their presence, and depending on the survey outcome, action for removal of encroachment (if found)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.