Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.Saravanan, J
V.Asokan Solomon – Appellant
Versus
The Executive Committee, Rep by its Chairman / Bishop-Incharge, CSI Kanniyakumari Diocese – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for appointment objections. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. discussion on previous proposal and objection. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. interim orders regarding the appointment process. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. details of voting and oversight committee. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. confirmation of voting results and affirmation. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. final observations on voting legality. (Para 15) |
| 7. declaration of the decision acceptance. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 8. implications of interim order. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 9. pending applications and potential outcomes. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 10. discussion on future appointments and scenarios. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 11. arguments on judicial authority and outcome. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 12. challenges regarding appointment validity. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 13. clarification of judicial intent and resolution. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 14. independence in disciplinary proceedings proposition. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 15. decision on authority for disciplinary actions. (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 16. final conclusions regarding appointment disputes. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 17. closure of the writ petition. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
