Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. DHANABAL, J
The Management Copral Energy Private Limited Rep.By Its Managing Director S.R. Jeyaprakash – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Commissioner Of Labour SALEM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed to quash m.w.case order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. minimum wages not paid as per government guidelines. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioner's payments claimed to satisfy minimum wage requirements. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. arguments regarding separate payment of basic pay and allowances. (Para 12 , 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. definition of wages under minimum wages act. (Para 14 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. judicial precedent regarding minimum wage calculations. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 7. writ petition allowed; m.w.case order quashed. (Para 22) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the first respondent in M.W.Case.No.34 of 2022 dated 21.04.2023, and to quash the same.
2. The respondents 2 to 57 herein have filed an application through their Union before the first respondent under the Minimum Wages Act as per the GO passed by the Government through G.O.No.67(2D) 13.11.2017. The said application was allowed. Aggrieved by the said order, the present writ petition has been filed.
3. According to the respondents 2 to 57, as per GO, for the years 2021, 2022 and 2023, the petitioner management have not paid the minimum wages. Therefore, they have approached the authorit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
