Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.N.MANJULA, J
Krishnamoorthy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. focuses on the court's reasoning regarding the dismissal of the trial court's ruling. (Para 20 , 26 , 29) |
| 2. highlights the assessment of prima facie evidence and intentions regarding criminal charges. (Para 22) |
| 3. addresses specifics of allegations related to the public nature of harassment. (Para 25) |
| 4. concludes with the outcome and reasons for the appeal's success. (Para 28 , 30) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
These Criminal Appeals have been filed challenging the common order of the learned Principal District Judge, Karur, dated 27.11.2024, made in Crl.M.P.Nos.862 and 870 of 2024 in Spl.SC No.08 of 2024.
2.The appellants in Crl.A(MD) No.646 of 2025 are the accused Nos.2 and 3 and the appellants in Crl.A(MD) No.647 of 2025 are the accused Nos.4 and 5.
3.As per the case of the prosecution the first accused and the defacto complainant have been in love with each other and during that time, on the compulsion of the first accused and on the pretext of marrying her, the defacto complainant was subjected to repeated sexual intercourse with him. When the defacto complainant and her family members insisted the first accused to marry her, he refused to marry.
4.On 18.09.2023, at about 7:30
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
