Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. DHANDAPANI, J
PASUMPONNAIYA @ PONNAIYA – Appellant
Versus
KARUPPANAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to suit and necessary party inclusion (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. claims regarding property ownership and history (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. legal rights concerning alienation (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's decision on claims and rights (Para 9) |
| 5. outcome of the revision petition (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated
28.03.2022 passed in I.A.No.2 of 2021 in O.S.No.292 of 2018 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Dindigul.
2.The petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No.292 of 2018. The first defendant and the mother of the plaintiff and the defendants 6 to 10 are brother and sister. The plaintiff filed a partition suit as against his brothers, sisters and his maternal uncle. The claim of the petitioner/plaintiff is that originally the entire suit schedule property belonged to one Andiyappa Gounder, father of the petitioner's mother. The said Andiyappa Gounder have two sons viz., the petitioner and the first defendant and one daughter, who is the mother of the defendants 6 to 10.
3.The mother of the defendants 6 to 10, namely Karyppayammal, while she was alive, executed a settlement deed in favour of the sixth defendant in the year 201
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
