2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 100594
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
G.Ravi – Appellant
Versus
Mr.M.S.Govindharajan – Respondent
WMP/17508/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.02.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
WMP. No.17508 of 2021
in
Review No.SR64783 of 2021
in W.P.No.5324 of 2005
G.Ravi
..Petitioner/Sought to file the above
Review Application No. SR64783/2021
in this Court.
Vs.
1.M.S.Govindarajan
2.The Special Commissioner &
Commissioner of Land Reforms,
Chepauk, Chennai-5.
3.The Assistant Commissioner,
Competent Authority,
Urban Lan Tax & Urban Land Ceiling,
T.Nagar,
349, Arcot Road,
Kodambakkam, Chennai-24.
..Respondents
Petition filed under Article 151 of Cr.P.C, to grant
leave in favour of the petitioner to file a review petition as
against the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.5324 of 2005
dated 25.11.2005.
Prayer in W.P.No.5324 of 2005: This Writ Petition filed under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to
issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records
of the respondent relating to orders under section 9(5) passed
by the 2nd respondent dated 10/8/1979 vide ref. A3/A.68/Ada/78
dated 1/9/79 vide ref.A3/A-69/Ada/78 is respectively and notice
under section 11(5) dated 19-12-1980 vide ref.A3/4476/79 and
dated 14/10/80 respectively, in respect of land in S.No.7/1
Block No.14, Kotturpuram Village, measuring 4 Grounds and 694
sq.ft. which is in my possession, out of a larger extent of 33
grounds and 328 sq.ft. and quash the same and further direct the
2nd respondent to treat all proceedings relating to the
acquisition of the above land as abated under section 4 of Tamil
Nadu Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act 20 of 1999.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
For Petitioner : Mr. P.Paramasiva Doss
For Respondents : Mr. T.Thiyagarajan R1
Mr. G.Nanmaran R2 & 3
Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
The petition has been filed to grant leave in favour
of the petitioner to file a review petition as against the order
passed by this Court in W.P.No.5324 of 2005 dated 25.11.2005.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the first
respondent has encroached the government pathway. For removal of
the encroachment made by the first respondent in respect of the
pathway, he made a representation to the Government. The
Government has rejected the said representation made by the
petitioner. However, the Government issued notice to the first
respondent herein under Section 11(5) of the Urban and Land
Ceiling Act. Hence, the first respondent herein had filed a
writ petition in W.P.No.5324 of 2005 challenging the said notice
issued under Section 11(5) of the Urban and Land Ceiling Act
and this Court, vide its order dated 25.11.2005, allowed the
same in favour of the first respondent.
3. In the meanwhile, the District Collector vide his
proceedings dated 29.11.2011, rejected the representation dated
04.08.2010 made by the petitioner for removal of the
encroachment. Challenging the proceedings of the District
collector, the petitioner has filed a writ petition in
W.P.No.3260/2019 before this Court. The Hon'ble Division Bench
of this court was pleased to dismiss the said petition on
26.09.2019. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present
miscellaneous petition to grant leave to the petitioner to file
a review petition as against the order passed by this Court in
W.P.No.5324 of 2005 dated 25.11.2005.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/review
petitioner and perused the material available on record.
5. The learned Counsel for the review petitioner
raised the same grounds that were raised before this Court in
Writ Petition. The grounds raised in the affidavit filed in
support of the petition is also the same that was raised in the
Writ petition.
6. The power of review is very limited and the matter
cannot be allowed to be reheard. The Court may allow review on
three specified grounds viz.,
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservi