SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 99201

MADRAS HIGH COURT
GUNASUNDARI – Appellant
Versus
H.PUSHPALINGAM, – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.02.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

S.A.NO.645 OF 2017

Gunasundari

...Appellant / Plaintiff

Vs.

H.Pushpalingam

...Respondent / Defendant

PRAYER: The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil

Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 04.01.2017

in A.S.No.59 of 2016 on the file of the VII Additional Judge,

City Civil Court, Chennai, confirming the judgment and decree

dated 27.11.2015 in O.S.No.753 of 2012 on the file of the III

Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

For Appellant

:

Mr.K.Kannan

For Respondent :

Mr.R.Thiagarajan

J U D G M E N T

The unsuccessful plaintiff has preferred the present Second

Appeal challenging the concurrent findings of the Courts below.

2. The plaintiff filed a suit for partition claiming that

her father, by name K.Harikrishnan, during his life time, had

executed a Settlement Deed in her favour, vide vide Document

No.88 of 2006, dated 18.01.2006 at the office of the Sub-

Registrar, Royapuram, Chennai. She is entitled to half share of

the property and other half share was settled in favour of her

younger brother Pushpalingam. However,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top