2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 103148
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mrs Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
MRF Limited – Appellant
Versus
M.S. Trading Co. – Respondent
CS/458/1996
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)
THURSDAY, THE 07th DAY OF APRIL 2022
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
C.S.No.458 of 1996
MRF Limited
124, Greams Road,
Madras - 600 006.
... Plaintiff
Vs.
1. M.S.Trading Co.
Babari Mandi,
Aligarh - 202 001.
2. Mohamed Suleiman
Proprietor,
M.S.Trading Co.
Babari Mandi,
Aligarh - 202 001.
3. Gupta Lock & Hardware Agency,
113 A, Manohardas Katra,
Calcutta - 7
... Defendants
Civil Suit praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass
judgement and decree:-
a) granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, by
themselves or through their servants, agents, representatives or any one
claiming through them from reproducing, publishing, printing or causing to
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2
publish or using in any manner or in any material form on any goods, the
impugned artistic work as shown in Document No.2 or any other artistic
work which contains a reproduction of the whole or any portion of the
plaintiff's MRF Connected Letter Device artistic work as displayed in
Document No.1 and / or in any manner infringing the Copyright of the
plaintiff in the artistic work as shown in Document No.1.
b) granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendants and
their servants, agents, representatives or any one claiming through them
from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale or advertising for sale their
Iron Aldrop Door Bolts and other goods, using in connection with the goods
of the plaintiff's trademark MRF and / or the trade mark device shown in
Document No.2 or any other trade mark, which is identical with or
deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trade marks 'MRF' or the MRF
Connected Letter Device trade mark (shown in Document No.1) and passing
off or enabling others to pass off the defendant's goods as and for those of
the plaintiff's.
c) for mandatory injunction directing the defendants to surrender to
the plaintiff, all representations in any material form and all their Door Bolts
and other goods, packaging materials, cartons, sales promotion material,
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3
advertising material and hoardings, letter heads, visiting cards, office
stationery and all other materials containing / bearing the trade mark MRF
and / or the trade mark / artistic work as shown in Document No.2 to the
plaintiff for destruction.
d) for a preliminary decree in favour of the plaintiff, directing the
defendants to render an account of profits made by them by the use of the
trade mark MRF and the trade mark / artistic work shown in Document No.2
on Door Bolts or on any of their goods or in any other manner and a final
decree in favour of the plaintiff for the amount of the profit found to have
been made by the defendants after the defendants have rendered accounts.
e) directing the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the costs of the suit.
This Civil Suit coming on this day before this court for hearing in the
presence of Mr.C.Daniel, advocate for the Plaintiff herein and upon reading
the plaint filed herein and the suit in C.S.No.458 of 1996 having been
dismissed for non prosecution against the 3rd defendant vide order dated
15.10.1997, and the learned counsel for the plaintiff having submitted that
the defendants have stopped using the plaintiff's trademark, and at present,
they are not carrying on any business by using the plaintiff's trademark,
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4
It is ordered as follows:-
That the suit in C.S.No.458 of 1996 be and is hereby disposed of
with liberty to the plaintiff to file a fresh suit against the defendants in the
event the defendants continue to infringe the plaintiff's trademark.
2. That there shall be no costs of this suit.
WITNESS