SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 84218

MADRAS HIGH COURT
RAMALINGA NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
VIJAYA AMMAL – Respondent


ORDER

The revision petitioners are the respondents/judgment debotrs in E.P.No.2 of 2004 in O.S.No.166 of 2002 on the file of I Additional Sub Court, Cuddalore.

2. The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No. 166 of 2002 for specific performance of contract and after full contest, the said suit was decreed by the learned I Additional Subordinate Judge, vide decree and judgment dated 29.06.2004 directing the revision petitioners/defendants to execute a sale deed in favour of the respondent/plaintiff after receiving balance sale consideration of Rs.25,000/- and in default, for execution of such sale deed by the Court, in favour of the petitioners. Thereafter, the respondent/plaintiff filed E.P.No.2 of 2004 in O.S.No.166 of 2002 before the I Additional Sub Court, Cuddalore. In the said proceedings, the revision petitioners filed an application in E.A.No.251 of 2009 praying for closure of the suit by holding that the suit agreement and decree stand rescinded in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and that the respondents also repaid the entire amount by executing a document dated 4.8.2008, whereby, the said agreement was cancelled. In the Executing Court, the respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top