2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 87064
MADRAS HIGH COURT
PANDIAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent
CRL OP 22677/2021
['M/S R C PAUL KANAGARAJ', '', 'M SOUNDAR VIJAY ARUL RAM', 'M ANTHONY', 'B BOOPATHY']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
CRL.O.P.No.22677 of 2021
and
CRL.M.P.No.12342 of 2021
M.Pandian
... Petitioner
Versus
1.State rep. by
The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Pallavaram Range,
Pallavaram,
Chennai.
... Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records of the
summon issued under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. dated 15.09.2021 by
the respondent in C.No.27/COP/PG/2021 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : M/s.R.C.Paul Kanagaraj
For R1
: Mr.E.Raj Thilak,
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for
the records of the summon issued under Section 91 of Cr.P.C.
dated 15.09.2021 by the respondent in C.No.27/COP/PG/2021 and
quash the same.
2. It is averred in the petition that the petitioner was
served with a summon by the respondent under Section 91 of
Cr.P.C. directing him to appear for enquiry on 23.11.2021 and
29.11.2021 based on the complaint lodged by one Prasanth before
the Commissioner of Police, Chennai.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the current paper enquiry in C.No.27/COP/PG/2021 dated
15.09.2021 summon under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. cannot be issued.
The employment of Section 91 of Cr.P.C would arise only after
the registration of the case. In this case admittedly no FIR has
been registered hence the petitioner challenged the same.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor without going
into the merits of the case would submit that the life of the
summon has already been expired. The petitioner was directed to
appear for enquiry before the Commissioner of Police on
23.11.2021 & 29.11.2021 now it is January 2022, there is no
force in the summon.
5. In view of the above submission made, the petition
becomes infructuous and finding that the summon issued against
the petitioner for his appearance on 23.11.2021 and 29.11.2021
has already been lapsed, there is nothing survives to act on his
summon. Recording the same this Criminal Original Petition is
disposed of. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is
also closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VII)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
dpq
To
1.The Assistant Commissioner of Police,
Pallavaram Range,
Pallavaram,
Chennai.
2.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.22677 of 2021
and
CRL.M.P.No.12342 of 2021
RSV(CO)
GMY(10/02/2022)
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/