2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 76764
MADRAS HIGH COURT
K.Ramachandran, S/o. Late R.Kailasam, – Appellant
Versus
The Official Liquidator, High Court – Respondent
COMP.A/138/2022
Comp.A.No.138 of 2022
in C.P.No.73 of 2000
Comp.A.No.138 of 2022
in
C.P.No.73 of 2000
M.SUNDAR, J
Captioned application has been taken out with a prayer for
'Condonation of Delay' ['COD'] qua filing of Form 66.
2. Ms.K.Jamuna, learned counsel for applicant and Mr.Bavisetty
Sridhar, learned 'Deputy Official Liquidator' ('Dy.OL' for the sake of brevity)
on behalf of the respondent (Official Liquidator) are before this Court.
3. The defects in the proof of debt came to the knowledge of the
applicant only recently and that has been cited as one of the reasons for the
COD prayer.
4. However, learned Dy. OL fairly submits that he has no serious
opposition or objections to the COD prayer.
Page:1/2
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Comp.A.No.138 of 2022
in C.P.No.73 of 2000
M.SUNDAR, J
gpa/nsa
5. Therefore captioned application ordered as prayed for i.e., delay
condoned subject to the condition that the applicant shall submit his Form 66
along with original supporting documents in the Office of the Official
Liquidator within a fortnight from today i.e., on or before 13.05.2022.
6. Captioned Application ordered as above. There shall be no order as to
costs.
29.04.2022
gpa/nsa
Comp.A.No.138 of 2022
in
C.P.No.73 of 2000
Page:2/2
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis