2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 88132
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dr Mathew Cherian – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent
WP 12692/2022
['M/S Subbaraya Aiyar Padmanabhan', '', 'RAMAMANI', 'A P SRINIVAS SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL TAKES NOTICE']
W.P.Nos.12692 of 2022 etc. batch
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved on:11.08.2022
Pronounced on: 01.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P.Nos.12692, 14810, 14829, 14833, 15384, 19632, 19634, 19637, 14515,
14592, 14897, 14979, 14993, 15082, 15084, 15268, 15276, 15281, 15289,
15304, 15317, 15365, 15386, 15388, 15448, 15452, 15455, 15458, 15721 &
15079, 15995 of 2022 and
WMP.Nos.14469, 14470, 14472, 14545, 14596, 14597, 14598, 18952,
18955, 18957, 14035, 14036, 14038, 14040, 14042, 14104, 14106, 14108,
14200, 14203, 14205, 14215, 14216, 14217, 14295, 14296, 14298, 14299,
14300, 14301, 14433, 14436, 14437, 14450, 14451, 14452, 14455, 14456,
14457, 14462, 14465, 14466, 14482, 14483, 14484, 14516, 14517, 14518,
14536, 14537, 14538, 14539, 14540, 14541, 14543, 14544, 14601, 14602,
14603, 14606, 14608, 14609, 14612, 14613, 14614, 12143, 14978, 14980,
15315, 15318, 15320, 18956, 18942, 18944, 18946, 18948, 18949, 19568,
14007, 14008, 14033, 12146, 12147, 13716, 13717, 13718, 13788, 13789,
13790, 14289, 14290, 14006 & 14976 of 2022
WP.No.12692 of 2022:
Dr.Mathew Cherian,
C-5, Parsn’s Royal Bungalow, Sesh Nestle,
Nanjundapuram,
Coimbatore – 641 036.
... Petitioner
Vs
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Non Corporate Circle-4,
Main Building,
63, Race Course Road,
Coimbatore – 641 018.
... Respondent
1
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.12692 of 2022 etc. batch
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the Respondent in
PAN: AAMPC8266C and quash the impugned Order under section 148A(d) of
the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 12.04.2022 in DIN & Notice
No:ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1042709932(1), and the consequential notice
u/s.148 of the Act dated 12.04.2022 in DIN & Notice
No:ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022-23/1-1042714624(1) for the Assessment year
2018-19.
(In all WPs)
For Petitioners
: Mr.AL.Somayaji, Senior Counsel
for Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan
for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar Padmanabhan
(In all WPs except WP.No.15995 of 2022)
For Respondents
: Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel
and
Mr.ANR.Jayaprathap, Junior Standing Counsel
(In WP.No.15995 of 2022)
For Respondent
: Mrs.HemaMuralikrishnan, Senior Standing Counsel
C O M M O N O R D E R
This batch of Writ Petitions has been filed at the instance of several
doctors specializing in different areas of medicine, who challenge proceedings
for re-assessment in terms of Section 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(in short ‘Act’).
2
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.12692 of 2022 etc. batch
2. There was a survey in Kovai Medical Centre and Hospital (in short
KMCH or hospital) by the officials of the Income Tax Department, on
22.11.2021. In the course of the survey, various documents were found and
seized that, according to the respondents, are incriminating as they point to the
existence of an employer –employee relationship inter se the parties.
3. The documents include ‘employee confidentiality agreement’, ‘revised
guidelines for practice of medicine at KMCH’ and joining reports, all of which
lead the officers to suspect that the doctors were employed with the hospital and
were not visiting consultants.
4. On the basis of the above documents and consequent inferences, the
authorities have come to a conclusion that (i) employer-employee relationship is
established (ii) petitioners are to be construed as employees and not full
time/visiting consultants and (iii) the income returned by them has to be
assessed under the head ‘salary’ and not ‘professional income’.
5. The impugned orders relate to assessment year (in short ‘AY’) 2018-
19. A show cause notice was issued on various dates under clause (b) of Section
148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The notice was accompanied by an
annexure setting out the reasons on the basis of which the Department was