SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Inkor Auto Tech India Pvt Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner (CT) – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S ADITHYA REDDY', '', 'NAVEENA D', 'SWARNAM J RAJAGOPALAN', 'AMIRTHA DINAKARAN GOVT ADVOCATE']

W.P.No. 3673, 3674, 3677 & 3678 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17.11.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

W.P.Nos.3673, 3674, 3677 & 3678 of 2020 &

WMP.Nos.4331, 4332, 4335, 4336, 4339, 4340, 4342 & 4343 of 2020

Inkor Auto Tech India Pvt. Ltd.

Sl.No.71/2B, 3B, 4B

Irungattukottai Village,

Kancheepuram District

... Petitioner in all WPs

Vs.

Assistant Commissioner (CT),

Sriperumbudur Assessment Circle,

Varadarajapuram-602103

... Respondent in all WPs

Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India, to issue a Writ of certiorari calling for the records of the

respondent in order dated 25.11.2014 in TIN:33241662588/2006-07,

33241662588/2007-08, 33241662588/2008-09 & 33241662588/2009-10

and quash the same.

In both WPs

For Petitioner

: Mr.Adithya Reddy

For Respondent

: Ms.Amritha Dinakaran

Government Advocate

1

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No. 3673, 3674, 3677 & 3678 of 2020

COMMON ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner makes an endorsement to the effect

that the assessee prefers to withdraw these

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top