2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 91095
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI
R.Krishnaraj – Appellant
Versus
The Registrar – Respondent
WP/7572/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
W.P.No.7572 of 2021
and W.M.P.Nos.8089 & 19889 of 2021
R.Krishnaraj
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Registrar of Co-operative Societies (Housing),
Tamil Nadu Co-operative
Housing Federation Building,
1st Floor, No.48, Ritherdon Road, Vepery,
Chennai 600 007.
2.The Deputy Registrar of
Co-operative Societies (Housing),
No.26, Therku Kavarai Theru,
Manjakuppam Cuddalore,
Cuddalore District.
3.The Inquiry Officer,
E- 2729, Public Servants Co-op.,
Housing Building Society,
No.2, Abdul Kadar Lane,
Manjakuppam, Cuddalore,
Cuddalore District.
4.The President,
E-2729, Public Servants Co-op.,
Housing Building Society,
No.2, Abdul Kadar Lane,
Manjakuppam, Cuddalore,
Cuddalore District.
.. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of
Certiorari, calling for the records of the 3rd respondent's
impugned inquiry report under section 81 dated 04.03.2019 of the
3rd Respondent and quash the same.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Raja
for M/s.M.Kaviveerappan
For Respondents
: Mr.T.K.Saravanan
Government Advocate
O R D E R
The petitioner has come out with the present Writ Petition
challenging the impugned inquiry report of the 3rd respondent
dated 04.03.2019 passed under Section 81 of the Tamil Nadu
Cooperative Societies Act.
2.According to the petitioner, he was working as Co-
operative Sub-Registrar in Cuddalore District. The 4th
respondent Society is established for Government servants. In
the said Society, the petitioner was elected as Vice-President
for the period from 01.11.1996 – 25.05.2001. During the said
period, he was acting as in-charge Secretary of 4th respondent
Society from 03.10.1998 – 25.05.2001. Subsequently, he was
working as Special Officer of the 4th respondent Society from
25.05.2001 – 30.09.2004. The petitioner attained age of
superannuation on 30.06.2012, but was not allowed to retire, as
he was placed under suspension on 08.06.2012. One Tmt.M.Ramani
and M.Ganesan availed housing loan to the tune of Rupees Five
Lakhs from the 4th respondent Society for the purpose of raising
construction and mortgaged the property measuring an extent of
2280 sq.ft. comprised in T.S.Nos.555 and 556 situated in Ward
No.2, Block No.7, Kovalan Street, Cuddalore and a mortgage deed
was registered as Document No.2921/1999 on the file of Joint Sub
Registrar Office, Cuddalore-2. The said Ramani and Ganesan
failed to repay the amounts. The 4th respondent Society initiated
proceedings under Section 90 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative
Societies Act (hereinafter referred to as, 'the Act') and
obtained decree dated 28.05.2004. Subsequently, the 4th
respondent did not proceed further against the said Ramani and
Ganesan to execute the decree. While so, by proceedings of 2nd
respondent dated 09.08.2018, the 3rd respondent was appointed as
Enquiry Officer under Section 81 of the Act to conduct enquiry.
Even prior to that, an enquiry under Section 81 of the Act was
already ordered, enquiry conducted and report was filed. The
enquiry now ordered is second enquiry. The enquiry under Section
81 of the Act cannot be ordered again and again as it amounts to
double jeopardy. The present Enquiry Officer filed report
stating that the petitioner has sold mortgaged property along
with borrower and recommended to initiate criminal proceedings
against the petitioner, the said M.Ramani and M.Ganesan, the
borrowers.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended
that Enquiry Officer has no power to recommend to initiate
criminal proceedings. The 4th respondent,