2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 102086
MADRAS HIGH COURT
J.RAVI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE BY – Respondent
CRL OP 29012/2018
['M/S N MANOKARAN', '', 'N S SUGANTHAN', 'R RENUKADEVI', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR', '', 'A YOGARAJA', 'M THANU', 'M/S R MARUDHACHALAMURTHY']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON : 01.04.2022
PRONOUNCED ON : 27.05.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Crl.O.P.No.29012 of 2018 and
Crl.M.P.No.16946 of 2018
1.J.Ravi
2.R.Savitha
3.R.Narayanan
... Petitioners
Versus
1.The State by the Inspector of Police,
Kannankurichi Police Station,
Crime No.650 of 2018,
Salem District.
2.N.Muthukumar
... Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating
to the FIR in Crime No.650 of 2018 on the file of the 1st
respondent Police, Quash the same by allowing this Criminal
Original Petition.
For Petitioners : Mr.M.Ganesh for
Mr.N.Manokaran
For R1
: Mr.A.Damodaran,
Additional Public Prosecutor
For R2
: Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash
the FIR in Crime No.650 of 2018, dated 29.11.2018, on the file
of the 1st respondent Police.
2.The 2nd
respondent lodged a complaint to the
Commissioner of Police, Police on 30.10.2018, which was
forwarded to the 1st respondent Police on 01.11.2018. On the
complaint, an FIR in Crime No.650 of 2018, for offence under
Section 420 IPC, was registered against the petitioners on
29.11.2018.
3.The complaint is that the petitioners and the 2nd
respondent are known to each other and they are devotees of
Thirumoorthy Malai Swamigal. The petitioners 1 and 2 were
running a business in the name and style of M/s.Xedon Media
Private Limited at Gorimedu, Salem. The petitioners 1 and 2
were unable to repay the business loan obtained in City Union
Bank, Erode Branch and they became defaulters. The petitioners
1 and 2 intended to get loan from Canara Bank, Gorimedu Branch,
Salem by mortgaging the 1st petitioner's father property, for
which they had to show some bank transaction in the bank account
maintaining in the name of M/s.Xedon Media Private Limited.
Hence, the petitioners 1 and 2 approached the 2nd respondent on
01.03.2018 and asked them to deposit Rs.21,00,000/- in M/s.Xedon
Media Private Limited bank account and thereafter, the same
would be re-transferred to the 2nd respondent's bank account. It
is only an adjustment. Further, the petitioners 1 and 2 also
promised to convey the property in favour of the 2nd respondent.
For the above bank transaction, the 3rd petitioner was engaged by
the petitioners 1 and 2 and the entire transaction was handled
by him.
Believing the same, the 2nd
respondent gave
Rs.21,00,000/- to his Manager Angamuthu and also gave his two
Axis Bank account Nos.917030032895768 and 915030006267074 for
the transaction, the said Angamuthu proceeded to Canara Bank,
Gorimedu Branch, Salem. At about 10.30 a.m., Angamuthu handed
over Rs.21,00,000/- to the 3rd petitioner, who received the cash,
deposited the same in M/s.Xedon Media Private Limited bank
account and gave NEFT slip showing that the amount of
Rs.10,00,000/- transferred to the Axis bank account in
No.91503006267074 and the balance amount of Rs.11,00,000/-
transferred to the Axis bank account No.917030032895768. The
amount of Rs.10,00,000/- was credited to the 2nd respondent's
bank account. As regards, the amount of Rs.11,00,000/- is
concerned, the 3rd petitioner wrongly mentioned the last two
digits of the 2nd respondent bank account number and thereby, the
amount of Rs.11,00,000/- got re-credited to M/s.Xedon Media
Private Limited bank account.
4.The CCTV camera in Canara Bank, Gorimedu Branch, Salem
confirms the presence of the 2nd respondent's Manager Angamuthu
as well as the 3rd petitioner. Hence, the 2nd respondent lodged a
complaint to the 1st respondent against the petitioners herein.
5.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted t