MADRAS HIGH COURT
2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.02.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN CRP(NPD)Nos.205 & 206
D)Nos.205 & 206
CRP(NPD)Nos.205 & 206 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
CRP(NPD)Nos.205 & 206 of 2022 and
CMP.No.1048 of 2022
Chandra
... Petitioner in both CRPs
Vs
Anbukkarasan
... Respondent in both CRPs
Common Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, against the order dated 04.12.2021 in I.A.Nos.127 and
128 of 2021 in HMOP.No.16 of 2002 on the file of Subordinate Judge,
Attur.
(In both CRPs)
For Petitioner
: Mr.R.Mubarak Basha
COMMON ORDER
The challenge in these revisions is to the order of the trial Court
dismissing applications in I.A.Nos.127 and 128 of 2021 filed by the
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP(NPD)Nos.205 & 206 of 2022
petitioner seeking to reopen the case and to enable cross examination of the
respondent. The proceedings are under the Hindu Marriage Act. The
husband had sought for divorce on the ground for cruelty and desertion. The
original proceeding was instituted in the year 2002 is almost 20 years now.
The wife had filed the applications seeking to reopen and for permission to
cross examine the husband, who was examined as PW1 on the ground that
while cross examining the husband, certain questions based on the
pleadings in the reply statement have not been asked.
2.The learned trial Judge on an assessment of the evidence which
is already on record had concluded that several questions have been put
based on the averments in the reply statement and therefore, these petitions
have been filed only to drag on the proceedings. The learned trial Court has
also taken note of the fact that this Court had directed the trial Court to
dispose of the O.P. within a period of three months from 05.03.2021.
3.In view of the said categorically finding of the trial Court the
cross examination is complete. I do not think I should interfere with the
2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP(NPD)Nos.205 & 206 of 2022
order of the trial Court, both the revisions are therefore dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
03.02.2022
vs
Index: No
Speaking order
To:
1.The Subordinate Judge, Attur.
2.The Section Officer,
VR Section,
Madras High Court, Chennai.
3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP(NPD)Nos.205 & 206 of 2022
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
vs
CRP(NPD)Nos.205 & 206 of 2022 and
CMP.No.1048 of 2022
03.02.2022
4/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.