2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 90818
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
RITHANYA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP.BY – Respondent
CRL MP/3999/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Twenty Fifth day of March Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION Nos.3999,4000 & 4001 of 2022
IN CRL.OP.NOs.18417,19796 & 19798/2021
C.RITHANYA [ PETITIONER/ACCUSED
CRL.MP.NO.3999/2022
IN CRL.OP.NO.18417/2021]
CHINNAMANI
[ PETITIONER/ACCUSED
CRL.MP.NO.4000/2022
IN CRL.OP.NO.19796/2021]
SANKAR
[ PETITIONER/ACCUSED
CRL.MP.NO.4001/2022
IN CRL.OP.NO.19798/2021]
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE.
IN ALL THE PETITIONS]
EOW-II POLICE STATION,
CHENNAI.
(CR.NO.25 OF 2021)
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in
the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax
the condition imposed by this Hon`ble Court in Crl.M.P.NOs.
918,919&916 of 2022 in CRL.OP.NOs.18417,19796&19798 of 2021 order
dated 31.01.2022 the petitioners shall report before the petitioners
shall appear before the respondent police monthly twice i.e on first
and fifteenth of every Month at 1.30a.m until further orders and also
appear before the Commissioner regularly CRL.OP.NOs. 18417, 19796 AND
19798/ 2021.[Crl.M.P.NOs.3999,4000&4001/2022]
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the
petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the
arguments of M/S. K.SUTHAN, Advocate for the petitioner [IN ALL THE
PETITIONS]and of MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)[IN ALL
THE PETITIONS]on behalf of the Respondent the court made the
following order:-
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
These petitions have been filed to relax the condition imposed
in Crl.MP.Nos. 918, 916 and 919 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.Nos. 18417, 19796
& 19798 of 2021 dated 26.10.2021.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) states that
investigation is yet to be completed and the co-operation of the
petitioner is required to complete the investigation.
4. Taking note of the fact that the investigation is not yet
completed, relaxing the condition at this juncture will not be
conducive for completing the pending investigation. Hence, the
condition to report before the Investigating Officer monthly twice
cannot be relaxed further.
5. Accordingly, these Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are
dismissed.
-sd/-
25/03/2022
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE SPECIAL JUDGE
UNDER THE TAMIL NADU PROTECTION OF INTEREST
OF DEPOSITERS (IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENT) ACT 1997,
CHENNAI.
2 THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN (RETD.),
NO.36, 2ND CROSS STREET,
RAYALA NAGAR, RAMAPURAM,
CHENNAI-600 089.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE.
EOW-II POLICE STATION,
CHENNAI.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
C.C. to M/S. K.SUTHAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges
Order
in
CRL MP.NOs.3999,4000&4001/2022
in
CRL.OP.NOs.18417,19796&19798/2021
Date :25/03/2022
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format
CSK 31/03/2022
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/