2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 100204
MADRAS HIGH COURT
SANPREET CASTINGS PRIVATE LTD – Appellant
Versus
TAMILNADU ELECTRICITY – Respondent
WP 9699/2011
['m/s r s pandiyaraj', '', 'P S VASANTHAKUMAR', 'M SARAVANAKUMAR', 'TNEB STANDING COUNSEL TAKES NOTICE']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
WP NO.9699 OF 2011
AND
MP NO.1 OF 2011
Sanpreet Castings Private Ltd., HT SC No.197
4/5, Gandhi Nagar, G.N.Mills Post,
Coimbatore - 641 029.
Rep. by its Manager R.Palanivel
... Petitioner
Vs.
1. Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission
19-A, Rukmini Lakshmipathy Salai,
(Marshall's Road) Egmore,
Chennai - 600 008.
Rep. by its Secretary
2. The Chairman
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
144, Anna Salai,
Chennai - 600 002.
3. The Superintending Engineer
Coimbatore Elec. Distribution Circle
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Coimbatore.
... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of
Certiorari, to call for the records of the 3rd respondent in his
impugned bill dated 01.04.2011 issued by the 3rd respondent in
so far as it relates to levy of energy charges under Serial No.1
for Rs.3,75,644/- without adjusting 93,911 units of peak hour
energy available to the credit of the petitioner in the normal
hours consumption, levying excess demand charges under Serial
No.13(b) for 72.02 KVA to the tune of Rs.43,209/- without taking
into consideration of the deemed demand of 131.48 KVA available
to the petitioner, thus levying a total sum of Rs.4,18,853/- are
illegal, arbitrary and without the authority of law and against
Clause 8.7.3 and Clause 8.11.2 of Comprehensive Tariff Order on
Wind Energy Order No.1 of 2009 dated 20.03.2009 issued by the
1st respondent, quash the same.
For Petitioner :
Mr.S.P.Parthasarathy
for Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj
For Respondents :
Mr.Abdul Kalam
Standing Counsel
O R D E R
The petitioner challenges the levy of charges under
Serial No.1 for Rs.3,75,644/-.
2.In similar circumstances, a batch of writ petitions
for the very same relief were transferred by this Court to the
Tamil Nadu Regulatory Commission, by order dated 23.07.2012 in
W.P.No.7200 of 2012 and others. Subsequently, the Tamil Nadu
Electricity Regulatory Commission by its order dated 31.03.2016
decided the matter in the following lines:-
"7.14 In the light of the above it is
clarified that the Units generated by Wind
Energy Generators during a higher tariff ToD
slot could be consumed in a lower tariff ToD
slot at the option of generators/users who have
entered into EPA and EWA under the Commission’s
Order No. 3 dt.15.5.2006.
7.15 Let us now take up the purport of the
orders giving liberty to renegotiate the
existing agreements and applicability of the
orders when it comes to the existing contracts
and agreements between NCES based generators
and distribution licensee signed prior to the
date of issue of these orders.
7.16 In the Tariff order No. 3 dated
15.05.06, the Commission decided to categorise
the Wind Electric generators in two groups as
below and fixed the tariff accordingly:
1. Group I Projects : Wind power projects
commissioned and to be commissioned based on
agreements executed prior to the date of this
order.
2. Group II Projects: Wind Power projects
to be commissioned based on future agreements
after the date of this order.
7.17 Hence, the above Tariff order (Order
No. 3 dated dated 15.05.2006) stipulates the
following in respect of the Applicability of
Order:
“4.0 Applicability of Order: This order
shall come into force from the date of its
issue. This order shall be applicable to all
future
and
renewal
of
existing
contracts/agreements for the Non-conventional
Energy Sources (NCES) based Generating plants
and Non-conventional Energy sources based Co-
generation plants located within the State of
Tamil Nadu. It should be noted that the
existing contracts and agreements between NCES
based generators and the distribution licensee
signed prior to the date of issue of this order
would con