MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
2022 Rangarajan Narasimhan ..Petitioner-in-person – Appellant
Versus
1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Government – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.03.2022 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.1981
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.P.No.1981 of 2022
Rangarajan Narasimhan ..Petitioner-in-person
Vs
1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
2. The Secretary,
Department of Tourism, Culture and
Religious Endowments,
Secretariat,
Chennai - 600 009.
3. The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Dept.,
119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai,
Nungambakkam,
Chennai - 600 034.
..Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying for a writ of mandamus directing the third
respondent to put up necessary visible sign boards clearly
mandating the dress-code (distinct Sanathana Dharma mark on the
forehead of male/female devotees, dhothi/pyjama-kurta for men
folk and saree/half-saree/salwar kameez for women folk) and
fully covered clothing for children and to put in place checks
and balances to ensure that any person entering into the temple
is a believer of Sanathana Dharma in an effort to prevent
atheists from entering into the Hindu temple.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
For the Petitioner
: Mr.Rangarajan Narasimhan
Petitioner-in-person
For the Respondents
: Mr.R.Shunmugasundaram
Advocate-General
assisted by
Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan
Spl. Govt. Pleader (HR & CE)
for respondent Nos.2 and 3
: Mr.P.Muthu Kumar
State Government Pleader
for respondent No.1
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner,
appearing in person, seeking the following relief:
"For the reasons stated in the affidavit
accompanying prayed that this Hon'ble court may be
pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other
appropriate Writ, Order or Direction in the nature
of Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent
to put up necessary visible sign boards clearly
mandating the dress-code (distinct Sanathana
Dharma mark on the forehead of male/female
devotees, dhothi/pyjama-kurta for men folk and
saree/half-saree/salwar kameez for women folk) and
fully covered clothing for children and to put in
place checks and balances to ensure that any
person entering into the temple is a believer of
Sanathana Dharma in an effort to prevent atheists
from entering into the Hindu Temple and pass such
or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit
to the facts and circumstances of the case and
thus render justice."
2.The petitioner, appearing in person, submitted that a
direction be issued on the third respondent to put up necessary
visible sign boards mandating the dress code (distinct sanathana
dharma mark on the forehead of male/female devotees;
dhothi/phyjama-kurta for men folk and saree/half-saree/salwar
kameez for women folk) and fully covered cloths for children;
and, to put in place the checks and balances to ensure that any
person entering the temple is a believer of sanathana dharma.
3.He further submitted that as per the provisions of the
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 (for short,
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
"the Act of 1959"), only a Hindu can enter the temple. But, in
the absence of dress code, even persons of other religion are
making entry into the temple. The prescription of dress code is
necessary to maintain the sanctity of the temple. Therefore, a
general direction be given to the respondents to put a sign
boards in the temples requiring the dress code to be followed.
The petitioner, appearing in person, has produced certain
photographs to show that in the absence of dress code, the
people are entering into the temple in different dresses.
4.The writ petition has been opposed by learned Advocate-
Genera
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.