SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
SRIMUSHANAN V.RAJARAO – Appellant
Versus
THE PRESIDENT, The Music Academy, Madras and 2 others – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S V RAGHAVACHARI', '', 'V LAKSHMINARAYANAN-MS', 'V SRIMATHI', 'COUNTER AFFDVT FILED D NO DT']

A.No.2130 of 2022

in C.S.No.445 of 2019

A.No.2130 of 2022

in C.S.No.445 of 2019

Krishnan Ramasamy, J.,

This application has been filed by the applicant/petitioner to adduce

certain additional documents, viz., video clippings which were saved in a Pen

Drive.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents, however, raised an

objection that whatever the applicant sought to be adduced as additional

documents, are pertaining to certain video clippings downloaded and saved in a

Pen Drive, cannot be permitted since by virtue of this, the applicant is trying to

expand the scope of the present suit itself by introducing a fresh cause of action,

which has to be taken within a year and that the said video clippings are of the

year 2018 and thereby, they are barred by limitation. Further, the applicant has

not taken any steps to file a petition seeking amendment of the pleadings of the

plaint. Therefore, the learned counsel for the respondents sought for rejection of

the application.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that there

are pleadings in the plaint and these additional documents, viz., video clippings

1

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top