MADRAS HIGH COURT
SRIMUSHANAN V.RAJARAO – Appellant
Versus
THE PRESIDENT, The Music Academy, Madras and 2 others – Respondent
A.No.2130 of 2022
in C.S.No.445 of 2019
A.No.2130 of 2022
in C.S.No.445 of 2019
Krishnan Ramasamy, J.,
This application has been filed by the applicant/petitioner to adduce
certain additional documents, viz., video clippings which were saved in a Pen
Drive.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents, however, raised an
objection that whatever the applicant sought to be adduced as additional
documents, are pertaining to certain video clippings downloaded and saved in a
Pen Drive, cannot be permitted since by virtue of this, the applicant is trying to
expand the scope of the present suit itself by introducing a fresh cause of action,
which has to be taken within a year and that the said video clippings are of the
year 2018 and thereby, they are barred by limitation. Further, the applicant has
not taken any steps to file a petition seeking amendment of the pleadings of the
plaint. Therefore, the learned counsel for the respondents sought for rejection of
the application.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that there
are pleadings in the plaint and these additional documents, viz., video clippings
1
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.