2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 84885
MADRAS HIGH COURT
E.VANITHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent
CRL OP 16237/2022
['M/S K R RAMESH KUMAR', '', 'M MATHAN RAJ', 'S AROCKIARAJ', 'R RAGHU RAJ', 'A NAGARAJAN', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']
Crl.OP.No.16237 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.07.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.OP.No.16237 of 2022
E.Vanitha
..Petitioner/A1
Vs.
State by:
Inspector of Police,
Bank Fraud Investigation Wing, Team-31,
Central Crime Branch,
Egmore, Chennai.
(Crime No.158 of 2020).
..Respondent
PRAYER:
Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Crime
No.158 of 2020 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Bank Fruad
Investigation Wing, Team-31, Central Crime Branch, Egmore, Chennai.
For Petitioner
: Mr.A.Nagarajan
For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran,
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.16237 of 2022
custody on 30.06.2022 for the offence punishable under Sections 420,
465, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC in crime No.158 of 2020 on the file of the
respondent police, seeks bail.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that M/s. RME Sea Foods,
had approached the de-facto complainant branch and applied for
business loans and it was sanctioned on 25.11.2015 by then Chief
Manager of the Branch Mrs. Celine Santiago. The said company was
sanctioned a term loan of Rs.17,00,000/- (Rupees Seventeen Lakhs Only)
for doing sea food processing business and an OD limit of Rs.80,00,000/-
(Rupees Eighty Lakhs Only) was sanctioned to meet working capital
needs and both term loans were not covered by any collateral security, as
it was sanctioned under CGTMSE. The term loan was to be repaid in
EMI's of Rs.30,788/- each starting from 29.02.2016 till 30.11.2022.
Later, the party started to make default and failed to pay monthly term
loan instalments and ultimately both the loan accounts become NPA on
30.06.2017. Further, the unit has been closed without informing the de-
facto complainant. Hence, the case.
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.16237 of 2022
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would
submit that on 02.08.2019, one Mr.G.Ashok Raj, Chief Manager,
Syndicate Bank, T.Nagar Branch lodged a complaint with the
Commissioner of Police, Chennai through proper channel vide C.
No.4399/CCB/COP/V/2019,
C.No.3657/DC/CCB-I/COP/V/2019,
C.No.2153/AC-BF/COP/V/2019. On receipt of the complaint, the
respondent herein registered a case on 05.05.2020 in Crime No.158 of
2020 for the alleged offence as against the petitioner.
4. Even according to the de-facto complainant, A1 borrowed
loan from the de-facto complainant to the tune of Rs.97,00,000/- by
mortgaging property worth about Rs.80,00,000/-. Now, the loan account
also become Non Performing Asset. That apart, the complaint is lodged
in the year 2019 and the First Information Report was registered in the
year 2020.
5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case
3/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.16237 of 2022
and also considering the period of incarceration from the date of arrest
i.e., 30.06.2022, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her
executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only)
with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned
CCB & CBCID Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai and on
further conditions that:
[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb
Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of
their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily
at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when
required for interrogation.
[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation
or trial.
[d] the petitioner sh