MADRAS HIGH COURT
PAVAN HARLALKA HUF – Appellant
Versus
NARENDRA HARLALKA HUF AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent
A.Nos.3485 & 3486 of 2022
in C.S.No.229 of 2017
A.Nos.3485 & 3486 of 2022 in
C.S.No.229 of 2017
Reserved On :
04.11.2022
Pronounced On:
111622
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.J.,
A.No.3485 of 2022 and A.No.3486 of 2022 in C.S.No.229 of 2017
have been filed seeking permission to the applicant/plaintiff to file reply
statement to the written statement filed by defendants 1 and 3
respectively.
2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that fresh
reply statement is filed by the plaintiff in answer to the written statement
filed by the first defendant. It is necessitated for the reason that certain
new facts, averments and contentions are raised by defendants in their
written statement. Therefore, it has become necessary to file a detailed
reply statement. Only if the reply statements are permitted to be filed,
applicant will be in a position to pursue the suit.
1/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.Nos.3485 & 3486 of 2022
in C.S.No.229 of 2017
3.The learned counsel for the first respondent/first defendant
strongly opposed this application on the ground that the written
statement was filed by the first respondent giving specific answer to th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.