MADRAS HIGH COURT
DART INDUSTRIES INC – Appellant
Versus
Techno Plastic Industries – Respondent
CS 828/2015
C.S.No.828 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Judgment reserved on
01.09.2022
Judgment pronounced on
23.11.2022
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Civil Suit No.828 of 2015
1. Dart Industries Inc.
(a Corporation founded under the
Laws of Delaware, U.S.A.)
14901, South Orange Blossom Trail,
Orlando, Florida 32837, U.S.A.
Rep. by its constituted Attorney
Ms. Kimberly Weate
2. Tupperware India Pvt. Ltd.
204-206, Tolstoy House,
15, Tolstoy Marg,
New Delhi, 110 001
Rep. by its Authorized Signatory,
Ms.Vandita Batta ... Plaintiffs
vs.
Techno Plastic Industries
210/10, Rampur Jattan,
(Dhakewala) Nahan Road,
Moginand, Kala Amb.
Distt.-Sirmour
Himachal Pradesh
... Defendant
_____________
Page No.1 of 52
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S.No.828 of 2015
The suit is filed under Order IV Rule 1 of High Court O.S. Rules
read with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC, Sections 27, 134 & 135 of the Trade
Marks Act, 1999, praying to grant Judgment and Decree on the following
terms: (a) A permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, its proprietors
or partners or director as the case may be, their sister concerns, associates,
assigns in business, distributors, stockists dealers, agents and servants from
manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly in
any manner including through websites or other online shopping portals
dealing in plastic products/lunch bag in any size bearing the impugned trade
dress and get-up or any other trade dress and get-up as may be that are
fraudulent or obvious imitation of the Plaintiffs' trade dress and get-up
amounting to passing off of Plaintiffs' products in any manner whatsoever;
(b) A decree for delivery up of the impugned goods of the Defendant
including their moulds along with mould drawings, CNC (Computer
Numerical Control) files, dies, blocks, plates and engraving printed
materials such as brochures or other promotional material or any other
material bearing or depicting the impugned trade dress and get up, to an
authorized representative of the Plaintiffs for destruction; (c) An order for
rendition of accounts of profits illegally earned by the Defendant and a
decree for an amount so found due or in the alternative; (d) The defendant
be ordered to pay to the Plaintiffs a sum of Rs.20,00,000.00 (Rupees twenty
lakhs only) towards compensatory and punitive damages towards the illegal
activities by the defendant; and (e) an order for costs of the proceedings.
_____________
Page No.2 of 52
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S.No.828 of 2015
For Plaintiffs : Mr.Hemant Singh
for M/s.Arun C.Mohan,
Ms.Mamta R.Jha and
Mr.Keerthikiran Murali
For Defendant : Mr. Satish Parasaran, Senior Advocate
for M/s.R.Sathish Kumar and
Ms.V.Priya
JUDGMENT
Fascinating questions relating to the ambit of trade dress
protection arise for consideration in this case, in the factual context of three
products of the plaintiffs vis-a-vis three corresponding products of the
defendant. Even more fundamentally, the boundaries and contours of the
common law remedy of passing off are tested and challenged by entailing
answers to questions such as: what is the impact of copying on a passing off
action?
2. The plaintiffs are manufacturers of containers used in the
kitchen to store food products. These products are sold under the brand
name 'Tupperware'. The defendant is also a manufacturer of containers used
for storage of food products. The defendant's products are sold under the
brand name 'Signoraware'. The plaintiffs have brought this action seeking
remedies in respect of alleged passing off by the defendant in relation to the
_____________
Page No.3 of 52
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S.No.828
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.