A.Nos.3600 and 3603 of 2022

A.No.3600 of 2022

in Tr.C.S.No.282 of 2011 &

A.No.3603 of 2022

in C.S.No.535 of 2009

G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.

Application No.3600 of 2022 is filed to bring on record the legal

representatives of the deceased 1^st defendant as defendants 7 and 8 in

Tr.C.S.No.282 of 2011.

2. Application No.3603 of 2022 is filed to bring on record the 28^th respondent

as the legal representative of the deceased 1^st defendant as 29^th defendant in

C.S.No.535 of 2009.

3. The suit in C.S.No.535 of 2009 is filed seeking,

(i) for declaring that the sale deed dated 14.06.2007 executed by 1^st

defendant in favour of the 4^th defendant, in so far as it relates to the A Schedule

property as null and void;

(ii) for declaring that the sale deed dated 31.12.2007 executed by defendants

1,4 and 7 to the defendants 8 to 10, in so far as it relates to the A Schedule

property as null and void;

(iii) for declaring that the sale deed dated 31.12.2007 executed by defendants

1/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.Nos.3600 and 3603 of 2022

1,4 and 7 to the defendants 11 to 13, in so far as it relates to the A Schedule

property as null and void;

(iv) for declaring that the sale deed dated 31.12.2007 executed by defendants

1,4 and 7 to the defendants 14 to 17, in so far as it relates to the A Schedule

property as null and void;

(v) for declaring that the sale deed dated 31.12.2007 executed by defendants

1,4 and 7 to the 18^th defendant, in so far as it relates to the A Schedule property as

null and void;

(vi) for declaring that the sale deed dated 03.01.2008 executed by defendants

1,4 and 7 to the defendants 19 and 20, in so far as it relates to the A Schedule

property as null and void;

(vii) for declaring that the sale deed dated 03.01.2008 executed by defendants

1,4 and 7 to the 21^st defendant, in so far as it relates to the A Schedule property as

null and void;

(viii) for declaring that the sale deed dated 11.01.2008 executed by

defendants 1, 4 and 7 and registered as document No.61/2008 to the 22^nd

defendant, in so far as it relates to the A Schedule property as null and void;

(ix) for declaring that the sale deed dated 11.01.2008 executed by defendants

1, 4 and 7 and registered as document No.62/2008 to the 22^nd defendant, in so far

2/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.Nos.3600 and 3603 of 2022

as it relates to the A Schedule property as null and void;

(x) for declaring that the sale deed dated 11.01.2008 executed by defendants

1, 4 and 7 and registered as document No.63/2008 in favour of 23^rd defendant, in

so far as it relates to the Schedule A property as null and void;

(xi) for declaring that the sale deed dated 11.01.2008 executed by defendants

1, 4 and 7 and registered as document No.64/2008 in favour of 23^rd defendant, in

so far as it relates to the Schedule A property as null and void;

(xii) for Permanent Mandatory Injunction directing the defendants 8 to 24 to

pay the rents.

(xiii) for Permanent Mandatory Injunction directing the defendants to

demolish the building constructed on the Schedule A property and deliver the

vacant possession and pay the costs of the suit.

4. The suit in Tr.C.S.No.282 of 2011 is filed seeking for relief of,

(i) Permanent Injunction restraining the 4^th, 5^th and 6^th respondents or their

men, agents, servants, subordinates or any other persons claiming from them in

any manner dealing with or developing or leasing the Schedule property including

by way of alienating any portion of the Schedule Property either as undivided

3/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.Nos.3600 and 3603 of 2022

interest or in specific portions to any other 3^rd parties and/or hand over possession

of any portion of the Schedule property to any other 3^rd party.

(ii) Mandatory Injunction directing the 4^th respondent to restore the Schedule

property to the condition prevailing as on the date of the sale deed dated

14.06.2007 executed