SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 90231

MADRAS HIGH COURT
MERIDIAN INDUSTRIES LTD., REP – Appellant
Versus
THE TNEB., REP.BY ITS – Respondent
WP 38342/2003



Advocates:
['M/S L S M HASAN FIZAL', '', 'GLADYS DANIEL', 'M/S M ABUL KALAM']

Writ Petition Nos.38342 and 38343 of 2003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 9/112022

C O R A M

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

Writ Petition Nos.38342 and 38343 of 2003

a n d

W.M.P.Nos.46538, 46539, 46542 and 46541 of 2003

Meridian Industries Limited

rep. By its Authorised Officer

Mr.G.Manikandan

“SUPREM”, P.B.No.3888, Race Course

Coimbatore 641 018.

...

Petitioner in

W.P.No.38342 of 2003

Precot Mills Limited

rep. By its Authorised Officer

Mr.G.Manikandan

“SUPREM”, P.B.No.3888, Race Course

Coimbatore 641 018.

...

Petitioner in

W.P.No.38343 of 2003

Vs

1. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

rep. By its Chairman

800 Anna Salai

Chennai 600 002.

2. The Superintending Engineer

Udumalpet Electricity Distribution Circle

Udumalpet.

...

Respondents in both

the writ petitions

Page No:1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Writ Petition Nos.38342 and 38343 of 2003

PRAYER : Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

praying for the issuance of writs of certiorarified mandamus to call for the

records of the second respondent pertaining to the demand notice dated

25/10/2003 having reference No.SE/UEDC/UDT/AO/R/HT/AS/A3/F.HTSC.230 and

238/C.50156/2003 and quash the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned

and consequently, forbear the respondents from including charges paid by the

petitioner to the IPP for the purpose of arriving at the Current Consumption

Deposit under clause 15.05 of the terms and conditions of electricity supply.

For Petitioners ...

Mrs.C.Uma

for Mrs.Gladys Daniel

For respondents

...

Mr.M.Abul Kalam

- - - - -

C O M M O N O R D E R

Today, when the matters were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw these

writ petitions. She has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the above, these writ petitions are dismissed as

Page No:2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Writ Petition Nos.38342 and 38343 of 2003

withdrawn. Liberty is granted to the petitioners to file fresh writ petitions, if

any new cause of action arises. No costs. Consequently, the connected

Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

9/11/2022

Index : Yes / No

Internet: Yes

Speaking/non speaking order

mvs.

To

1. The Chairman

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

800 Anna Salai

Chennai 600 002.

2. The Superintending Engineer

Udumalpet Electricity Distribution Circle

Udumalpet.

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J

mvs.

Page No:3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Writ Petition Nos.38342 and 38343 of 2003

W.P.Nos.38342 and 38343 of 2003

9/11/2022

Page No:4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top