SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 96739

MADRAS HIGH COURT
TMT.INDIRANI – Appellant
Versus
MRS.KALPANA – Respondent
CRP 1123/2016



Advocates:
['M/S S GANESH', '', 'V KRISHNAN', 'm/s g radhakrishnan', '', 'R - MRS KALPANA W/OPRAKASAM', 'NO', 'VATHUKARA ST', 'GORIMEDU', 'CANTONMENT', 'POONAMALLEE', 'CHENNAI']

Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.1123 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.04.2022

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.1123 of 2016

Indirani

... Petitioner

Vs.

1. Kalpana

2. Selvaraj

3. Eswari

4. Mani

... Respondents

This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of

India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order in I.A.No.1202 of 2014

in O.S.No.134 of 2013 dated 02.06.2015, on the file of the learned Additional

District Munsif, Poonamallee.

For Petitioner

:

No Appearance

For Respondents 1

:

No Appearance

For Respondents 2 to 4 :

Mr.G.Radhakrishnan

Page No.1 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.1123 of 2016

O R D E R

When the matter was listed for hearing on earlier occasions i.e. on

15.03.2022 and 19.04.2022, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

Hence, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter under the caption

"For Dismissal" on 25.04.2022.

2. Even today i.e., 25.04.2022, when the matter was called, there was

no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was passed over and

again called at 02:35 p.m., none appeared for the petitioner.

3. Thus, it is clear and evident that the petitioner is not interested in

prosecuting the case and this Court has no other option except to dismiss this

Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution.

4. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for

non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected C.M.P.No.6168 of

2016 is closed.

25.04.2022

Page No.2 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.1123 of 2016

Index

:

Yes/No

Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order

vm

To:

The Additional District Munsif,

Poonamallee.

Page No.3 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.1123 of 2016

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.

vm

Order in

C.R.P(PD)No.1123 of 2016

Page No.4 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.1123 of 2016

25.04.2022

Page No.5 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top