SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
TMT.INDIRANI – Appellant
Versus
MRS.KALPANA – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S S GANESH', '', 'V KRISHNAN', 'm/s g radhakrishnan', '', 'R - MRS KALPANA W/OPRAKASAM', 'NO', 'VATHUKARA ST', 'GORIMEDU', 'CANTONMENT', 'POONAMALLEE', 'CHENNAI']

Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.1123 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.04.2022

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.1123 of 2016

Indirani

... Petitioner

Vs.

1. Kalpana

2. Selvaraj

3. Eswari

4. Mani

... Respondents

This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of

India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order in I.A.No.1202 of 2014

in O.S.No.134 of 2013 dated 02.06.2015, on the file of the learned Additional

District Munsif, Poonamallee.

For Petitioner

:

No Appearance

For Respondents 1

:

No Appearance

For Respondents 2 to 4 :

Mr.G.Radhakrishnan

Page No.1 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Civil Revision Petition(PD)No.1123 of 2016

O R D E R

When the matter was listed for hearing on earlier occasions i.e. on

15.03.2022 and 19.04.2022, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

Hence, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter under the caption

"For Dismissal" on 25.04.2022.

2. Even today i.e., 25.04.2022, when the matter was called, there was

no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top