2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 100508
MADRAS HIGH COURT
MR.G.SASI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent
WP 27298/2013
['M/S P THIAGARAJAN', '', 'P NANDAKUMAR & K DHANALAKSHMI', 'S GUNASEKARAN G A', '', 'TAKES NOTICE']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI
W.P. No.27298 of 2013
and
M.P.Nos.1 of 2013 & 1 of 2015
Mr.G.Sasi ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.
The State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by its Secretary to Government,
Department of Revenue,
Fort St.George,
Chennai – 600 009.
2.
The District Collector,
Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram Town and District.
3.
The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram.
4.
The District Revenue Officer,
Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram.
5.
The Tahsildar,
Thiruporur,
Kancheepuram District.
...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the
respondents to evict the petitioner from S.No.237/1 of Alathur
Village, Thiruporur Taluk, without following the due process of
law.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Thiagarajan
For Respondents
: Mr.T.Chezhiyan, AGP
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a
Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents from evicting the
petitioner from S.No.237/1 of Alathur Village, Thiruporur Taluk,
without following due process of law.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he is in occupation of
a portion of land comprised in S.No.237/1, measuring an extent
of 25 cents, situated at Alathur Village, Thiruporur Taluk,
Kancheepuram District for more than 50 years. The petitioner
has put up a house in the said land and the same was assessed to
house tax and he has also obtained electricity service
connection. Similarly, his family members are also in occupation
of a portion of land measuring an extent of 20 cents each in the
above said land in S.No.237/1 for agricultural purposes.
Further, there are eight other families who are in occupation
and enjoyment of a portion of land in the above said S.No237/1.
Originally, the entire area had been waste land and the village
people for years together worked and made the land suitable
for agriculture.
3. While so, in the year 1988, some of the villagers tried
to disturb the possession of the petitioner and his family
members. Therefore, the petitioner's father filed a Suit in
O.S.No.849 of 1988 on the file of District Munsif, Chengalpattu
and the said suit was decreed in favour of the petitioner's
father. Pursuant to which, the petitioner's father approached
the respondents and sent various representations for grant of
patta, however, there was no response. Aggrieved by the same,
one Chandramathi,wife of the petitioner's brother, filed a Writ
Petition in W.P.No.12593 of 2010 and this Court, vide order
dated 07.07.2010 issued a direction to the District Collector to
consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.06.2010 within
a period of eight weeks, however, despite the order of this
Court, no orders have been passed by the respondents. While such
being the case, on 28.09.2013, the respondents started to remove
the fence in the petitioner's place, however, the same was
stopped by the petitioner and his family members. Further, the
petitioner and other persons were directed to appear before the
1st respondent on 30.09.2013, however, thereafter, no further
steps has been initiated by the respondents. Hence, aggrieved by
the inaction of the respondents, the present Writ Petition is
filed.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
based on the Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.854 Revenue
Department dated 30.12.2006, the Government has taken a policy
decision to assign the land to the occupants who are in
occupation for more than 5 years and prescribed the terms and
conditions and the Board Standing orders also provides for
assigning t