SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 90076

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Sharath Kumar Surendra – Appellant
Versus
P.S.USHA AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/s S Akash', '', 'J RAMESH-MS', 'SAM JAYARAJ HOUSTON-MS', 'COUNTER OF R FILED D NO DT']

A.No.2469 of 2022

A.No.2469 of 2022

in

C.S.No.207 of 2021

Reserved on

25.08.2022

Pronounced on

01.11.2022

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

This present application is filed by the applicant, praying to reject

the plaint under Order XIV Rule 8 of Madras High Court Original Side

Rules read with Order VII Rule 11(a) and 11(d) of Civil Procdure Code.

2. The applicant herein is the 4th defendant in the suit in

C.S.No.207 of 2021. The said suit has been filed by the 1st

respondent/plaintiff, namely, Ms. P.S.Usha, daughter of one Thiru

Ambigainathan, for partition of the suit schedule properties into 4 equal

shares and to allot 1/4th share to the 1st respondent/plaintiff and for

permanent injunction restraining all the respondents/defendant-brothers

and brothers’ son from dispossessing her from the suit schedule property.

Further the 1st respondent/plaintiff, also prays to declare the settlement

deed dated 27/02/2020 executed by his brother/1st defendant in favour of

her brother’s son i.e. Applicant/4th defendant herein as null and void.

3. According to the applicant, the suit schedule properties were

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.No.2469 of 2022

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top