2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 72949
MADRAS HIGH COURT
M.LATHA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP BY ITS – Respondent
CRL A 158/2019
['M/S V RAGHAVACHARI', '', 'V SRIMATHI', 'V LAKSHMINARAYANAN', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR', '', 'S S MEENAKUMARY', 'S SARAVANAN', 'R', 'M/S D BALACHANDRAN']
Crl.A.No.158 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.10.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.A.No.158 of 2019
M.Latha
...Appellant
-Vs-
1.The State,
Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station,
Virudhachalam, Cuddalore District.
(Crime No.16 of 2005)
2.Ramasamy
3.Kokila
... Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 372 of Code of Criminal
Procedure, to set aside the order in Crl.A.No.60 of 2017, on the file of the III
Additional District Judge, Virudhachalam, dated 16.07.2018 in reversing the
well considered order in C.C.No.209 of 2007, on the file of the Judicial
Magistrate No.I, Virudhachalam, dated 23.06.2017.
For Appellant : Mr.C.Saikrishna
for Mr.V.Raghavachari
For Respondents
For R1
: Mr.A.Gopinath
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
For R2 & 3 : Mr.D.Balachandran
Page 1 of 10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.158 of 2019
ORDER
This Criminal Appeal has been filed to set aside the order in Crl.A.No.60
of 2017, on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Virudhachalam, dated
16.07.2018 thereby reversing the order in C.C.No.209 of 2007, on the file of
the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Virudhachalam, dated 23.06.2017.
2. This Appeal has been directed as against the order passed in
C.A.No.60 of 2017 on the file of the III Additional District Judge,
Virudhachalam, thereby reversing the offence made in C.C.No.209 of 2017 on
the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Virudhachalam, thereby convicted the
respondents two and three herein.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the victim and the son of the
respondents two and three herein got married on 10.09.2004 and at the time of
their marriage, her husband was presented with totally 21 sovereigns of golden
jewels, a two wheeler and other household articles. The marriage expenditure
was also borne out by the appellant and her parents. Even prior to their
marriage, her husband was taking treatment at Government Hospital,
Tambaram, since he was suffering from HIV positive. The above said fact was
Page 2 of 10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.158 of 2019
known to the accused persons and by suppressing the same, they his arranged
marriage with the appellant. After the marriage, the victim lived with her
husband along with the respondents two and three herein. Thereafter, for his
treatment, the victim also paid a sum of Rs.1 lakh. Because of their
relationship, the victim also tested HIV positive and she had taken treatment at
Cuddalore. Further, her husband was also affected by Tuberculosis. On
11.05.2005, he was admitted in Government Hospital, Tambaram and he died
on 12.05.2005 due to HIV. Hence the complaint.
4. On receipt of the complaint, the first respondent registered FIR in
Crime No.13 of 2015 for the offence under Sections 417, 148, 420 and 498(A)
IPC. After completion of investigation, the first respondent filed final report
and the same has been taken cognizance by the trial Court as against these
accused persons for the charges under Section 498(A) and 417 IPC
5. On the side of the prosecution PW1 to PW8 were examined as
witnesses and Exs.P1 to P11 were marked as exhibits and on the side of the
defence, no one was examined and Exs.D1 to D4 were marked as exhibits.
Page 3 of 10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.No.158 of 2019
6. On perusal of oral and documentary evidence, the trial Court found the
respondents guilty for the offence under Sections 420 IPC and sentenced them
to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and further, found them guilty
for the other offences under Sections 498(A), 417 and 418 IPC. Aggrieved by
the same, the respondents two and three preferred an appeal and the same was
allowed and the finding of the trial Court was reversed. Aggrieved by the same,
the victim filed this appeal.
7. The learned counsel f