2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 82600
MADRAS HIGH COURT
RAMESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP BY – Respondent
CRL OP 185/2022
['M/S P CHANDRASEKAR', '', 'M SATHYASAI ESWARI', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.01.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
Crl.O.P.No.185 of 2022
Ramesh Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
State represented by
...Respondent
The Inspector of Police
(*)Thiruvottiyur Police Station,
Thiruvallur District.
(Crime No.1195 of 2003)
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the
event of his arrest concerned in S.C.No.166 of 2008, on the file of
the Additional District Sessions Court-IV, Ponneri.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Chandrasekar
For Respondent : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan
Additional Public Prosecutor
Dated:06/01/2022
: MR.L.Baskaran,Govt. Advocate( CRL. SIDE)
CRL.MP.NO.1863/2022 IN CRL.OP.NO.185/2022
Dated :28/02/2022
ORDER
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the
respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 3(1) TNPPDL
Act r/w 34 of IPC in S.C.No.166 of 2008, on the file of the
Additional District Sessions Court-IV, Ponneri. seeks anticipatory
bail.
2. When the case was posted for hearing, the petitioner did not
appear before the Court. Accordingly, the lower Court issued Non
Bailable Warrant against the petitioner on 27.06.2019 for his non
appearance.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner is now ready to appear before the trial Court and to abide
by any stringent conditions imposed by this Court. Hence he prays for
grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for
the respondent police.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this
Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with
certain conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail
in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of
fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of
the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the
Additional District Sessions Court-IV, Ponneri, on condition that the
petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the
satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who
intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate
concerned and on further condition that:
(a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs
and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned
may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure
their identity;
(b) the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on all
hearing dates, without fail.
(c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness
either during investigation or trial;
(d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation
or trial;
(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned
Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action
against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions
have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned
Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be
registered under Section 229-A IPC.
-sd/-
06/01/2022
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
(*)Ame