SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 86574

MADRAS HIGH COURT
A.NATARAJACHETTY – Appellant
Versus
INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
CRL MP 13937/2021



Advocates:
['M/S A UMASHANKAR', '', 'R SRINIVASALU', 'M MANOHARAN', 'S SARATHKUMAR']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Thursday, the Twenty Seventh day of January Two Thousand Twenty Two

PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M. NIRMAL KUMAR

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.13937 of 2021

IN CRL OP.25199/2021

1 A.NATARAJA CHETTY @ NATARAJAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ]

2 N.SARASWATHI

3 N.NAVEEN KUMAR @ NAVEEN

4 N.THEJASHWINI @ ASWINI

Vs

1 THE STATE REP.

[ RESPONDENTS / COMPLAINANT]

INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

HUDCO POLICE STATION,

HOSUR,

KRISHNAGIRI-635 109.

2 S.RAMACHANDIRAN

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the

High Court will be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in

FIR.No.461/2021, dated 01/10/2021, which is pending before the 1st

Respondent police station, pending disposal of this Crl.O.P.25199 of

2021.

Order: This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the

petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.R.GOKUL SUNDAR for

M/S.A.UMASHANKAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and of MR.E.RAJ THILAK,

Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent the court

made the following order:-

The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the

petitioners, who are the neighbors to the defacto complainant and they

have been falsely implicated in Crime No.461 of 2021 for offences

under Sections 427, 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC.

2. The case is that the domestic dispute between the neighbors

have been given a criminal colour and the petitioners have been

arrayed as accused A1 to A4.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was

a simple issue between the petitioners and the defacto complainant,

who are neighbors. The issue is that the defacto complainant has grown

some tress, and the root of the trees which penetrated into the soil

and caused damage to the compound wall of the petitioner, which is

made of red soil.

4. Mr.E.Raj Thilak, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes

notice for the respondent No.1. He further submits that

investigation completed and charge sheet made ready on 23.11.2021 and

the same is yet to be filed.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further

submits that there is a possibility of settlement, since it is a

dispute between the neighbors.

6. Considering the submissions and on perusal of the materials,

this Court directs the first respondent police to maintain status quo

and also directed not to file the final report before the concerned

Court.

7. Notice to the second respondent returnable by 21.02.2022.

Private notice is also permitted.

8. Post the matter on 21.02.2022.

-sd/-

27/01/2022

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into

execution by all concerned

TRUE COPY

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)

High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO

1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

HUDCO POLICE STATION,

HOSUR, KRISHNAGIRI.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 C.C. to M/S.A.UMASHANKAR Advocate on payment of necessary

charges SR.NO.1335

Order

in

CRL MP.13937/2021

in

CRL OP.25199/2021

Date :27/01/2022

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified

copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

INBA~07/02/2022

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top