2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 86574
MADRAS HIGH COURT
A.NATARAJACHETTY – Appellant
Versus
INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
CRL MP 13937/2021
['M/S A UMASHANKAR', '', 'R SRINIVASALU', 'M MANOHARAN', 'S SARATHKUMAR']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Seventh day of January Two Thousand Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice M. NIRMAL KUMAR
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.13937 of 2021
IN CRL OP.25199/2021
1 A.NATARAJA CHETTY @ NATARAJAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ]
2 N.SARASWATHI
3 N.NAVEEN KUMAR @ NAVEEN
4 N.THEJASHWINI @ ASWINI
Vs
1 THE STATE REP.
[ RESPONDENTS / COMPLAINANT]
INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
HUDCO POLICE STATION,
HOSUR,
KRISHNAGIRI-635 109.
2 S.RAMACHANDIRAN
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the
High Court will be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in
FIR.No.461/2021, dated 01/10/2021, which is pending before the 1st
Respondent police station, pending disposal of this Crl.O.P.25199 of
2021.
Order: This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the
petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.R.GOKUL SUNDAR for
M/S.A.UMASHANKAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and of MR.E.RAJ THILAK,
Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent the court
made the following order:-
The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the
petitioners, who are the neighbors to the defacto complainant and they
have been falsely implicated in Crime No.461 of 2021 for offences
under Sections 427, 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC.
2. The case is that the domestic dispute between the neighbors
have been given a criminal colour and the petitioners have been
arrayed as accused A1 to A4.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was
a simple issue between the petitioners and the defacto complainant,
who are neighbors. The issue is that the defacto complainant has grown
some tress, and the root of the trees which penetrated into the soil
and caused damage to the compound wall of the petitioner, which is
made of red soil.
4. Mr.E.Raj Thilak, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes
notice for the respondent No.1. He further submits that
investigation completed and charge sheet made ready on 23.11.2021 and
the same is yet to be filed.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further
submits that there is a possibility of settlement, since it is a
dispute between the neighbors.
6. Considering the submissions and on perusal of the materials,
this Court directs the first respondent police to maintain status quo
and also directed not to file the final report before the concerned
Court.
7. Notice to the second respondent returnable by 21.02.2022.
Private notice is also permitted.
8. Post the matter on 21.02.2022.
-sd/-
27/01/2022
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into
execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
HUDCO POLICE STATION,
HOSUR, KRISHNAGIRI.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1 C.C. to M/S.A.UMASHANKAR Advocate on payment of necessary
charges SR.NO.1335
Order
in
CRL MP.13937/2021
in
CRL OP.25199/2021
Date :27/01/2022
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format
INBA~07/02/2022
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/