MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mrs Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
V.Jeeva (Deceased) A.Daniel (Deceased) 1.Mr.James Stephen and 14 others – Appellant
Versus
R.Devi and 30 others – Respondent
A/514/2022
A.Nos.514 & 515 of 2022
in CS.No.114 of 2009
V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
The plaintiffs 3 to 6 were represented by the second defendant A.Danial
by way of Power of Attorney. Now, the second defendant A.Danial died and
the plaintiffs 3 to 6 are majors and they have to represent on their own.
2.Application No.514 of 2022 has been filed to pass an order to amend
the plaint by deleting the following words in the short cause title and long
cause title after the sixth plaintiff, plaintiffs 3 to 6 represented by their Power
of Attorny A.Daniel the second plaintiff herein in the above suit.
3.It is submitted that already independent Vakalat has been filed by the
counsel for the plaintiffs.
4.Application No.515 of 2022 has been filed to pass an order to implead
the 32nd respondent as proposed 32nd defendant in the above suit.
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
5.Now there are 31 defendants in the suit and one V.Rajagopal and 17
others represented by their Power of Attorney T.Shanthilal sold a portion of 'A'
schedule property to and in favour of one Smt.Prema Bai by means of a Sale
Deed dated 30.05.1991 under Document No.2944 of 1991. V.Ramachandran,
the 11th defendant herein sold 'A' schedule property to various persons wherein
the plaintiffs are entitled 2/5 share in the suit properties. The plaintiffs added
all the purchasers of 'A' schedule prpoperty. But due to inadvertence, the 32nd
defendant was omitted to be brought as party defendant in the suit.
6. Thereafter the trial was completed by examining PW1 on the plaintiffs
side and DW1 and DW2 on the defendants side, the defendants 15, 17, 20, 21
and 29 filed three applications. One is to receive additional written statement
and other applications are to re-open the case and to re-call DW1. Hence they
filed this application to implead the 32
nd defendant in the suit as necessary party
and if not allowed it will put great hardship and it will lead to multiplicity of
proceedings in future.
7.Having satisfied with the reasons stated in these affidavits filed in
support of these applications, these applications are allowed.
2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
8.Registry is directed to carryout the necessary amendment.
9.Notice to the 32
nd defendant returnable by 21.03.2022. Private notice
is also permitted.
10.Registry is also directed to number the applications pending in
D.Nos.37674 to 37676 of 2020 if it is otherwise in order and list the matter on
21.03.2022.
14.02.2022
pam
3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
V. BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
pam
A.Nos.514 & 515 of 2022
in CS.No.114 of 2009
14.02.2022
4/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.