2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 78302
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.03.2022 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.NO.11906 OF 2020 V.Gopinath .. Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
1. The Principal Secretary, Highways and Minor Ports Department, Fort St. George, S – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.P.NO.11906 OF 2020
V.Gopinath
.. Petitioner
Vs
1. The Principal Secretary,
Highways and Minor Ports Department,
Fort St. George, Secretariat,
Chennai - 600 009.
2. The District Revenue Officer,
Tiruppur District,
Collectorate Building,
Palladam Road, Tirupur - 641 604.
3. The Joint Chief Controller of Explosives,
A and D Wing, Block 1 - 8,
Shastri Bhavan,
No.26, Haddows Road, Nungambakkam,
Chennai - 600 006.
4. The Divisional Engineer,
(Construction and Maintenance)
Highways Department,
Collectorate Building,
Tirupur - 641 604.
5. The Executive Engineer,
Public Works Department (WRO),
Avinashi Road, Behind Camp Office,
Tirupur - 641 601.
6. M/s.Shell India Markets Private Limited,
Plot No.7, Bangalore Hardware Park,
Shell Technology Centre,
Devanahalli Industrial Park,
Mahadeva Kodigehalli, Bengaluru - 562 149.
.. Respondents
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for
the records of the No objection certificate No.R.Dis
No.2147/2019/c2 dated 25.02.2020 issued by the second respondent
in favour of the sixth respondent and quash the same and
consequently to restrain the sixth respondent from erection,
commissioning and operation of the New Road-side Petroleum
Retail Outlet on State Highways No.196 (SH-196) at SF.No.283-A,
Thottipalayam Village, Tirupur North Taluk, Tirupur District-641
668 in gross violation to the IRC Circular No.12-2009 G.O.(Ms)
79 dated 04.05.2017 and the Tamilnadu Combined Development and
Building Rules, 2019. (Prayer amended vide order dated
06.07.2021 made in W.M.P.No.1529 of 2021 in W.P.No.11906 of 2020)
For the Petitioner
: Mr.B.Harikrishnan
For the Respondents
: Mr.P.Muthukumar
State Government Pleader
asstd. by Mrs.E.Renganayaki,
AGP for respondent Nos.1, 2,
4 & 5
: Mr.B.Sudhir Kumar
SPC
for respondent No.3
: Mr.P.S.Raman
Senior Counsel
with
M/s.Jose John; M.Narendran
E.Joshua and Willy Francis
for M/s.King & Partridge
for respondent No.6
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
By this writ petition, a challenge is made to the no
objection certificate dated 25.02.2020 issued by the second
respondent in favour of the sixth respondent thereby permitting
the sixth respondent to open a new road-side petroleum retail
outlet on State Highways No.196 (SH-196) at S.F.No.283-A,
Thottipalayam Village, Tirupur North Taluk, Tirupur District.
It is alleged that the said permission is in violation of IRC
Circular No.12-2009, G.O.(Ms) No.79, dated 04.05.2017 and the
Tamil Nadu Combined Development and Building Rules, 2019.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. On 01.09.2020, this Court, after taking note of the
arguments that the Topo plan occurring at Page No.83 of the
typed set of papers shows that the proposed site is surrounded
by open land, whereas the Google map filed at Page No.82 of the
typed set of papers shows that the site is surrounded by a
mobile tower, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board transformer, a temple
and a burial ground etc., was of the view that by suppression of
material facts approval was sought by the sixth respondent and
therefore, an interim order was passed restraining the sixth
respondent from continuing the site works to open and operate a
new road-side Petroleum retail outlet on SH-196 at SF No.283A,
Thottipalayam Village, Tirupur District.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
approval of the site for opening a retail outlet is not
permissible, in view of G.O.(Ms) No.79, Housing and Urban
Development [UD4(d)] Department, dated 04.05.2017,